[libre-riscv-dev] daily kan-ban update 16may2020
[libre-riscv-dev.git] / 13 / b5e4b8b60eb6c9841f716f8b00a2e511e18f53
1 Return-path: <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>
2 Envelope-to: publicinbox@libre-riscv.org
3 Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:00:44 +0000
4 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=libre-riscv.org)
5 by libre-riscv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
6 (envelope-from <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>)
7 id 1jDnUB-0008GZ-0J; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:00:43 +0000
8 Received: from vps2.stafverhaegen.be ([85.10.201.15])
9 by libre-riscv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
10 (envelope-from <staf@fibraservi.eu>) id 1jDnU9-0008GT-Bb
11 for libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:00:41 +0000
12 Received: from hpdc7800 (hpdc7800 [10.0.0.1])
13 by vps2.stafverhaegen.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA1E11C0717
14 for <libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>;
15 Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:00:40 +0100 (CET)
16 Message-ID: <64807f160c5a47a90787482c6989b3b6a21076b5.camel@fibraservi.eu>
17 From: Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu>
18 To: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
19 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:00:34 +0100
20 In-Reply-To: <20200316112700.bef98590e39c27ae3b1cb63d@gmx.com>
21 References: <6AC4EFD4-AA30-42C7-855A-CE68A62F107F@gatech.edu>
22 <CAC2bXD6j_Swv4iOPMGC3ZgYpc8+ThqoFnOXqpXGkk4a1e_0Nqw@mail.gmail.com>
23 <20200315051018.svaw4aor7ifwn725@topoi.pooq.com>
24 <CAC2bXD7h90TXSCeFAM41NW-VbTizpWVueDu8KrmLHxBaX-7a=A@mail.gmail.com>
25 <E23AD06A-36A2-4322-98E3-20FBEC559026@gatech.edu>
26 <CAPweEDyaCDW575g4V7NQbiXhp+wLJR+EqaYjNHfHgpjnS7ENnQ@mail.gmail.com>
27 <1BB9EA49-275B-4365-963E-9FC21D574BB7@gatech.edu>
28 <16F24775-E25B-4E31-A1D4-145EB65FB1D8@gatech.edu>
29 <CAPweEDzeLs0br0dqzxdAWCovEBA0hyxBo89SPHykr3S7nTzBFg@mail.gmail.com>
30 <75CA4609-370F-455E-A88D-50E3766D45D7@gatech.edu>
31 <CAPweEDy4_=oHhz+nBZbjfUdbdVu-bHswHz+=QJhctOEzuWW0Yg@mail.gmail.com>
32 <884F8FEE-60FF-4580-A2E7-8AAA40A6DB6B@gatech.edu>
33 <CAC2bXD7fz6_KfymY5kMTFojHQsrmTGC2XZ958F1ju7s6tg-91A@mail.gmail.com>
34 <20200316091420.15087a26fab1be3d5fc23953@gmx.com>
35 <b096323f4ec162fed13b590ec9acd9899a5c120c.camel@fibraservi.eu>
36 <20200316112700.bef98590e39c27ae3b1cb63d@gmx.com>
37 Organization: FibraServi bvba
38 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-5.el7)
39 Mime-Version: 1.0
40 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23
41 Subject: Re: [libre-riscv-dev] LibreSOC - RISCV and POWER dual architecture
42 feasibility
43 X-BeenThere: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
44 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
45 Precedence: list
46 List-Id: Libre-RISCV General Development
47 <libre-riscv-dev.lists.libre-riscv.org>
48 List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/options/libre-riscv-dev>,
49 <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=unsubscribe>
50 List-Archive: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/pipermail/libre-riscv-dev/>
51 List-Post: <mailto:libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>
52 List-Help: <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=help>
53 List-Subscribe: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev>,
54 <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=subscribe>
55 Reply-To: Libre-RISCV General Development
56 <libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>
57 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6101105764784066556=="
58 Errors-To: libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org
59 Sender: "libre-riscv-dev" <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>
60
61
62 --===============6101105764784066556==
63 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
64 boundary="=-kPjvI6YDan7Z+MQtK3vG"
65
66
67 --=-kPjvI6YDan7Z+MQtK3vG
68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
69 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
70
71 Lauri Kasanen schreef op ma 16-03-2020 om 11:27 [+0200]:
72 > On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:53:38 +0100Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu> wro=
73 te:
74 > > Lauri Kasanen schreef op ma 16-03-2020 om 09:14 [+0200]:
75 > > > 486 and 586 patents had expired years ago, and we had Chinese 1 GHzim=
76 plementations of those (vortex86). Now they have 686 models, so Itake penti=
77 um pro patents are also up for use.
78 > >=20
79 > > I think these were because Via had cross-patent license agreement with =
80 Intel.
81 >=20
82 > DMP is not related to VIA. Via's C and Nano lines happened muchearlier, w=
83 ith the licensing.
84
85 I stand corrected; it was SiS which did the first Vortex86 and sold that li=
86 ne to DM&P.
87
88 Staf.
89
90
91
92
93 --=-kPjvI6YDan7Z+MQtK3vG--
94
95
96
97 --===============6101105764784066556==
98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
99 MIME-Version: 1.0
100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
101 Content-Disposition: inline
102
103 X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KbGlicmUtcmlz
104 Y3YtZGV2IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApsaWJyZS1yaXNjdi1kZXZAbGlzdHMubGlicmUtcmlzY3Yub3Jn
105 Cmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0cy5saWJyZS1yaXNjdi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9saWJyZS1yaXNj
106 di1kZXYK
107
108 --===============6101105764784066556==--
109
110