43/f7598a8a37761f98f34d22f7e1536681bd1a77

   1 Return-path: <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>
   2 Envelope-to: publicinbox@libre-riscv.org
   3 Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:36:24 +0000
   4 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=libre-riscv.org)
   5         by libre-riscv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
   6         (envelope-from <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>)
   7         id 1jHmLf-0003kD-Tj; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:36:23 +0000
   8 Received: from vps2.stafverhaegen.be ([85.10.201.15])
   9  by libre-riscv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
  10  (envelope-from <staf@fibraservi.eu>) id 1jHmLd-0003k7-DH
  11  for libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:36:21 +0000
  12 Received: from hpdc7800 (hpdc7800 [10.0.0.1])
  13  by vps2.stafverhaegen.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B6911C0458
  14  for <libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>;
  15  Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:36:20 +0100 (CET)
  16 Message-ID: <9e44930a0332eff507661e617796b9d0674b0e05.camel@fibraservi.eu>
  17 From: Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu>
  18 To: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
  19 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:36:15 +0100
  20 In-Reply-To: <CAPweEDwf7s=r6bhq6N=VG7QQ1iD4jHYEG6mGvtxL32Uxnhzqwg@mail.gmail.com>
  21 References: <CAPweEDx5QCCKxSr1gfuyuw_2D68Ld8fK85bEmmMTZi8S3w2E9g@mail.gmail.com>
  22  <29b1a9ecedda151dc9c8da6516c3691dfede62ef.camel@fibraservi.eu>
  23  <CAPweEDwfqMczPjg=5Fvt1J_S8nx1YK44XhyBY8H1abuTNF6=xg@mail.gmail.com>
  24  <6fa40cb78b3f8c013ca4953ccb4daa5c23e3b501.camel@fibraservi.eu>
  25  <CAPweEDxiyTEsneXN65Kq0HsEsdL3wdY=NYayq2tz5egXJNCVfg@mail.gmail.com>
  26  <e430ea6587d292166fd58460adf4dfebfad20c6d.camel@fibraservi.eu>
  27  <CAPweEDzEvtPYGKvGMvebmQzhJDhSgfvUOVZvB2WXxSbv_ebE8A@mail.gmail.com>
  28  <b18283c7e7a93fa8afdef2f0a8679b26e4569528.camel@fibraservi.eu>
  29  <CAPweEDwznLD5o6rHfWsSXR-8e1hbAfAB04f5O+YkL6pCwGsNfQ@mail.gmail.com>
  30  <6fbfb2a3258be77f4fce69661b283dc31a683f7b.camel@fibraservi.eu>
  31  <CAPweEDwf7s=r6bhq6N=VG7QQ1iD4jHYEG6mGvtxL32Uxnhzqwg@mail.gmail.com>
  32 Organization: FibraServi bvba
  33 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-5.el7)
  34 Mime-Version: 1.0
  35 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23
  36 Subject: Re: [libre-riscv-dev] cache SRAM organisation
  37 X-BeenThere: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
  38 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
  39 Precedence: list
  40 List-Id: Libre-RISCV General Development
  41  <libre-riscv-dev.lists.libre-riscv.org>
  42 List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/options/libre-riscv-dev>,
  43  <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=unsubscribe>
  44 List-Archive: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/pipermail/libre-riscv-dev/>
  45 List-Post: <mailto:libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>
  46 List-Help: <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=help>
  47 List-Subscribe: <http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev>,
  48  <mailto:libre-riscv-dev-request@lists.libre-riscv.org?subject=subscribe>
  49 Reply-To: Libre-RISCV General Development
  50  <libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org>
  51 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8086656049151897504=="
  52 Errors-To: libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org
  53 Sender: "libre-riscv-dev" <libre-riscv-dev-bounces@lists.libre-riscv.org>
  54
  55
  56 --===============8086656049151897504==
  57 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  58         boundary="=-p7q7BDl/EdOk4+ultaEv"
  59
  60
  61 --=-p7q7BDl/EdOk4+ultaEv
  62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
  63 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
  64
  65 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton schreef op vr 27-03-2020 om 09:44 [+0000]:
  66 > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 9:25 AM Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu> wrote=
  67 :
  68 > > My point is that you will have the same performance for the fixed 5-sta=
  69 ge pipeline running @ 800MHz
  70 >=20
  71 > no, it won't: it'll be half the clock speed.  it won't be double thenumbe=
  72 r of computations: it'll be the exact same number ofcomputations.  therefor=
  73 e, half the speed means half the number ofcomputations because the *through=
  74 put* is the same
  75 > when you use "cpufreq-set" to change the clock rate, if the clock rateis =
  76 halved, the computer is twice as slow.
  77
  78 You are right.
  79
  80 > yes it's confusing :)
  81
  82 Yes and no, it is the basic functionality of a pipeline :(
  83 You have the same latency but can have double the number of operations in f=
  84 light.
  85
  86 greets,
  87 Staf.
  88
  89
  90
  91
  92 --=-p7q7BDl/EdOk4+ultaEv--
  93
  94
  95
  96 --===============8086656049151897504==
  97 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
  98 MIME-Version: 1.0
  99 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 100 Content-Disposition: inline
 101
 102 X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KbGlicmUtcmlz
 103 Y3YtZGV2IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApsaWJyZS1yaXNjdi1kZXZAbGlzdHMubGlicmUtcmlzY3Yub3Jn
 104 Cmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0cy5saWJyZS1yaXNjdi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9saWJyZS1yaXNj
 105 di1kZXYK
 106
 107 --===============8086656049151897504==--
 108
 109
 110