Changed bitmap format images to svg vector format
[libreriscv.git] / docs / pinmux.mdwn
1 # Pinmux, IO Pads, and JTAG Boundary scan
2
3 Links:
4
5 * <http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~dmh/4b7/resource/section14.htm>
6 * <https://www10.edacafe.com/book/ASIC/CH02/CH02.7.php>
7 * <https://ftp.libre-soc.org/Pin_Control_Subsystem_Overview.pdf>
8 * <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50>
9 * <https://git.libre-soc.org/?p=c4m-jtag.git;a=tree;hb=HEAD>
10 * Extra info: [[/docs/pinmux/temp_pinmux_info]]
11
12 Managing IO on an ASIC is nowhere near as simple as on an FPGA.
13 An FPGA has built-in IO Pads, the wires terminate inside an
14 existing silicon block which has been tested for you.
15 In an ASIC, you are going to have to do everything yourself.
16 In an ASIC, a bi-directional IO Pad requires three wires (in, out,
17 out-enable) to be routed right the way from the ASIC, all
18 the way to the IO PAD, where only then does a wire bond connect
19 it to a single external pin.
20
21 [[!img asic_iopad_gen.svg]]
22
23 Designing an ASIC, there is no guarantee that the IO pad is
24 working when manufactured. Worse, the peripheral could be
25 faulty. How can you tell what the cause is? There are two
26 possible faults, but only one symptom ("it dunt wurk").
27 This problem is what JTAG Boundary Scan is designed to solve.
28 JTAG can be operated from an external digital clock,
29 at very low frequencies (5 khz is perfectly acceptable)
30 so there is very little risk of clock skew during that testing.
31
32 Additionally, an SoC is designed to be low cost, to use low cost
33 packaging. ASICs are typically only 32 to 128 pins QFP
34 in the Embedded
35 Controller range, and between 300 to 650 FBGA in the Tablet /
36 Smartphone range, absolute maximum of 19 mm on a side.
37 2 to 3 in square 1,000 pin packages common to Intel desktop processors are
38 absolutely out of the question.
39
40 (*With each pin wire bond smashing
41 into the ASIC using purely heat of impact to melt the wire,
42 cracks in the die can occur. The more times
43 the bonding equipment smashes into the die, the higher the
44 chances of irreversible damage, hence why larger pin packaged
45 ASICs are much more expensive: not because of their manufacturing
46 cost but because far more of them fail due to having been
47 literally hit with a hammer many more times*)
48
49 Yet, the expectation from the market is to be able to fit 1,000+
50 pins worth of peripherals into only 200 to 400 worth of actual
51 IO Pads. The solution here: a GPIO Pinmux, described in some
52 detail here <https://ftp.libre-soc.org/Pin_Control_Subsystem_Overview.pdf>
53
54 This page goes over the details and issues involved in creating
55 an ASIC that combines **both** JTAG Boundary Scan **and** GPIO
56 Muxing, down to layout considerations using coriolis2.
57
58 # Resources, Platforms and Pins
59
60 When creating nmigen HDL as Modules, they typically know nothing about FPGA
61 Boards or ASICs. They especially do not know anything about the
62 Peripheral ICs (UART, I2C, USB, SPI, PCIe) connected to a given FPGA
63 on a given PCB, and they should not have to.
64
65 Through the Resources, Platforms and Pins API, a level of abstraction
66 between peripherals, boards and HDL designs is provided. Peripherals
67 may be given `(name, number)` tuples, the HDL design may "request"
68 a peripheral, which is described in terms of Resources, managed
69 by a ResourceManager, and a Platform may provide that peripheral.
70 The Platform is given
71 the resposibility to wire up the Pins to the correct FPGA (or ASIC)
72 IO Pads, and it is the HDL design's responsibility to connect up
73 those same named Pins, on the other side, to the implementation
74 of the PHY/Controller, in the HDL.
75
76 Here is a function that defines a UART Resource:
77
78 #!/usr/bin/env python3
79 from nmigen.build.dsl import Resource, Subsignal, Pins
80
81 def UARTResource(*args, rx, tx):
82 io = []
83 io.append(Subsignal("rx", Pins(rx, dir="i", assert_width=1)))
84 io.append(Subsignal("tx", Pins(tx, dir="o", assert_width=1)))
85 return Resource.family(*args, default_name="uart", ios=io)
86
87 Note that the Subsignal is given a convenient name (tx, rx) and that
88 there are Pins associated with it.
89 UARTResource would typically be part of a larger function that defines,
90 for either an FPGA or an ASIC, a full array of IO Connections:
91
92 def create_resources(pinset):
93 resources = []
94 resources.append(UARTResource('uart', 0, tx='A20', rx='A21'))
95 # add clock and reset
96 clk = Resource("clk", 0, Pins("sys_clk", dir="i"))
97 rst = Resource("rst", 0, Pins("sys_rst", dir="i"))
98 resources.append(clk)
99 resources.append(rst)
100 return resources
101
102 For an FPGA, the Pins names are typically the Ball Grid Array
103 Pad or Pin name: A12, or N20. ASICs can do likewise: it is
104 for convenience when referring to schematics, to use the most
105 recogniseable well-known name.
106
107 Next, these Resources need to be handed to a ResourceManager or
108 a Platform (Platform derives from ResourceManager)
109
110 from nmigen.build.plat import TemplatedPlatform
111
112 class ASICPlatform(TemplatedPlatform):
113 def __init__(self, resources):
114 super().__init__()
115 self.add_resources(resources)
116
117 An HDL Module may now be created, which, if given
118 a platform instance during elaboration, may request
119 a UART (caveat below):
120
121 from nmigen import Elaboratable, Module, Signal
122
123 class Blinker(Elaboratable):
124 def elaborate(self, platform):
125 m = Module()
126 # get the UART resource, mess with the output tx
127 uart = platform.request('uart')
128 intermediary = Signal()
129 m.d.comb += uart.tx.eq(~intermediary) # invert, for fun
130 m.d.comb += intermediary.eq(uart.rx) # pass rx to tx
131
132 return m
133
134 The caveat here is that the Resources of the platform actually
135 have to have a UART in order for it to be requestable! Thus:
136
137 resources = create_resources() # contains resource named "uart"
138 asic = ASICPlatform(resources)
139 hdl = Blinker()
140 asic.build(hdl)
141
142 Finally the association between HDL, Resources, and ASIC Platform
143 is made:
144
145 * The Resources contain the abstract expression of the
146 type of peripheral, its port names, and the corresponding
147 names of the IO Pads associated with each port.
148 * The HDL which knows nothing about IO Pad names requests
149 a Resource by name
150 * The ASIC Platform, given the list of Resources, takes care
151 of connecting requests for Resources to actual IO Pads.
152
153 This is the simple version. When JTAG Boundary Scan needs
154 to be added, it gets a lot more complex.
155
156 # JTAG Boundary Scan
157
158 JTAG Scanning is a (paywalled) IEEE Standard: 1149.1 which with
159 a little searching can be found online. Its purpose is to allow
160 a well-defined method of testing ASIC IO pads that a Foundry or
161 ASIC test house may apply easily with off-the-shelf equipment.
162 Scan chaining can also connect multiple ASICs together so that
163 the same test can be run on a large batch of ASICs at the same
164 time.
165
166 IO Pads generally come in four primary different types:
167
168 * Input
169 * Output
170 * Output with Tristate (enable)
171 * Bi-directional Tristate Input/Output with direction enable
172
173 Interestingly these can all be synthesised from one
174 Bi-directional Tristate IO Pad. Other types such as Differential
175 Pair Transmit may also be constructed from an inverter and a pair
176 of IO Pads. Other more advanced features include pull-up
177 and pull-down resistors, Schmidt triggering for interrupts,
178 different drive strengths, and so on, but the basics are
179 that the Pad is either an input, or an output, or both.
180
181 The JTAG Boundary Scan therefore needs to know what type
182 each pad is (In/Out/Bi) and has to "insert" itself in between
183 *all* the Pad's wires, which may be just an input, or just an output,
184 and, if bi-directional, an "output enable" line.
185
186 The "insertion" (or, "Tap") into those wires requires a
187 pair of Muxes for each wire. Under normal operation
188 the Muxes bypass JTAG entirely: the IO Pad is connected,
189 through the two Muxes,
190 directly to the Core (a hardware term for a "peripheral",
191 in Software terminology).
192
193 When JTAG Scan is enabled, then for every pin that is
194 "tapped into", the Muxes flip such that:
195
196 * The IO Pad is connected directly to latches controlled
197 by the JTAG Shift Register
198 * The Core (peripheral) likewise but to *different bits*
199 from those that the Pad is connected to
200
201 In this way, not only can JTAG control or read the IO Pad,
202 but it can also read or control the Core (peripheral).
203 This is its entire purpose: interception to allow for the detection
204 and triaging of faults.
205
206 * Software may be uploaded and run which sets a bit on
207 one of the peripheral outputs (UART Tx for example).
208 If the UART TX IO Pad was faulty, no possibility existd
209 without Boundary Scan to determine if the peripheral
210 was at fault. With the UART TX pin function being
211 redirected to a JTAG Shift Register, the results of the
212 software setting UART Tx may be detected by checking
213 the appropriate Shift Register bit.
214 * Likewise, a voltage may be applied to the UART RX Pad,
215 and the corresponding SR bit checked to see if the
216 pad is working. If the UART Rx peripheral was faulty
217 this would not be possible.
218
219 [[!img jtag-block.svg ]]
220
221 ## C4M JTAG TAP
222
223 Staf Verhaegen's Chips4Makers JTAG TAP module includes everything
224 needed to create JTAG Boundary Scan Shift Registers,
225 as well as the IEEE 1149.1 Finite State Machine to access
226 them through TMS, TDO, TDI and TCK Signalling. However,
227 connecting up cores (a hardware term: the equivalent software
228 term is "peripherals") on one side and the pads on the other is
229 especially confusing, but deceptively simple. The actual addition
230 to the Scan Shift Register is this straightforward:
231
232 from c4m.nmigen.jtag.tap import IOType, TAP
233
234 class JTAG(TAP):
235 def __init__(self):
236 TAP.__init__(self, ir_width=4)
237 self.u_tx = self.add_io(iotype=IOType.Out, name="tx")
238 self.u_rx = self.add_io(iotype=IOType.In, name="rx")
239
240 This results in the creation of:
241
242 * Two Records, one of type In named rx, the other an output
243 named tx
244 * Each Record contains a pair of sub-Records: one core-side
245 and the other pad-side
246 * Entries in the Boundary Scan Shift Register which if set
247 may control (or read) either the peripheral / core or
248 the IO PAD
249 * A suite of Muxes (as shown in the diagrams above) which
250 allow either direct connection between pad and core
251 (bypassing JTAG) or interception
252
253 During Interception Mode (Scanning) pad and core are connected
254 to the Shift Register. During "Production" Mode, pad and
255 core are wired directly to each other (on a per-pin basis,
256 for every pin. Clearly this is a lot of work).
257
258 It is then your responsibility to:
259
260 * connect up each and every peripheral input and output
261 to the right IO Core Record in your HDL
262 * connect up each and every IO Pad input and output
263 to the right IO Pad in the Platform. **This
264 does not happen automatically and is not the
265 responsibility of the TAP Interface*
266
267 The TAP interface connects the **other** side of the pads
268 and cores Records: **to the Muxes**. You **have** to
269 connect **your** side of both core and pads Records in
270 order for the Scan to be fully functional.
271
272 Both of these tasks are painstaking and tedious in the
273 extreme if done manually, and prone to either sheer boredom,
274 transliteration errors, dyslexia triggering or just utter
275 confusion. Despite this, let us proceed, and, augmenting
276 the Blinky example, wire up a JTAG instance:
277
278 class Blinker(Elaboratable):
279 def elaborate(self, platform):
280 m = Module()
281 m.submodules.jtag = jtag = JTAG()
282
283 # get the records from JTAG instance
284 utx, urx = jtag.u_tx, jtag.u_rx
285 # get the UART resource, mess with the output tx
286 p_uart = platform.request('uart')
287
288 # uart core-side from JTAG
289 intermediary = Signal()
290 m.d.comb += utx.core.o.eq(~intermediary) # invert, for fun
291 m.d.comb += intermediary.eq(urx.core.i) # pass rx to tx
292
293 # wire up the IO Pads (in right direction) to Platform
294 m.d.comb += uart.rx.eq(utx.pad.i) # receive rx from JTAG input pad
295 m.d.comb += utx.pad.o.eq(uart.tx) # transmit tx to JTAG output pad
296 return m
297
298 Compared to the non-scan-capable version, which connected UART
299 Core Tx and Rx directly to the Platform Resource (and the Platform
300 took care of wiring to IO Pads):
301
302 * Core HDL is instead wired to the core-side of JTAG Scan
303 * JTAG Pad side is instead wired to the Platform
304 * (the Platform still takes care of wiring to actual IO Pads)
305
306 JTAG TAP capability on UART TX and RX has now been inserted into
307 the chain. Using openocd or other program it is possible to
308 send TDI, TMS, TDO and TCK signals according to IEEE 1149.1 in order
309 to intercept both the core and IO Pads, both input and output,
310 and confirm the correct functionality of one even if the other is
311 broken, during ASIC testing.
312
313 ## Libre-SOC Automatic Boundary Scan
314
315 Libre-SOC's JTAG TAP Boundary Scan system is a little more sophisticated:
316 it hooks into (replaces) ResourceManager.request(), intercepting the request
317 and recording what was requested. The above manual linkup to JTAG TAP
318 is then taken care of **automatically and transparently**, but to
319 all intents and purposes looking exactly like a Platform even to
320 the extent of taking the exact same list of Resources.
321
322 class Blinker(Elaboratable):
323 def __init__(self, resources):
324 self.jtag = JTAG(resources)
325
326 def elaborate(self, platform):
327 m = Module()
328 m.submodules.jtag = jtag = self.jtag
329
330 # get the UART resource, mess with the output tx
331 uart = jtag.request('uart')
332 intermediary = Signal()
333 m.d.comb += uart.tx.eq(~intermediary) # invert, for fun
334 m.d.comb += intermediary.eq(uart.rx) # pass rx to tx
335
336 return jtag.boundary_elaborate(m, platform)
337
338 Connecting up and building the ASIC is as simple as a non-JTAG,
339 non-scanning-aware Platform:
340
341 resources = create_resources()
342 asic = ASICPlatform(resources)
343 hdl = Blinker(resources)
344 asic.build(hdl)
345
346 The differences:
347
348 * The list of resources was also passed to the HDL Module
349 such that JTAG may create a complete identical list
350 of both core and pad matching Pins
351 * Resources were requested from the JTAG instance,
352 not the Platform
353 * A "magic function" (JTAG.boundary_elaborate) is called
354 which wires up all of the seamlessly intercepted
355 Platform resources to the JTAG core/pads Resources,
356 where the HDL connected to the core side, exactly
357 as if this was a non-JTAG-Scan-aware Platform.
358 * ASICPlatform still takes care of connecting to actual
359 IO Pads, except that the Platform.resource requests were
360 triggered "behind the scenes". For that to work it
361 is absolutely essential that the JTAG instance and the
362 ASICPlatform be given the exact same list of Resources.
363
364
365 ## Clock synchronisation
366
367 Take for example USB ULPI:
368
369 <img src="https://www.crifan.com/files/pic/serial_story/other_site/p_blog_bb.JPG"
370 width=400 />
371
372 Here there is an external incoming clock, generated by the PHY, to which
373 both Received *and Transmitted* data and control is synchronised. Notice
374 very specifically that it is *not the main processor* generating that clock
375 Signal, but the external peripheral (known as a PHY in Hardware terminology)
376
377 Firstly: note that the Clock will, obviously, also need to be routed
378 through JTAG Boundary Scan, because, after all, it is being received
379 through just another ordinary IO Pad, after all. Secondly: note thst
380 if it didn't, then clock skew would occur for that peripheral because
381 although the Data Wires went through JTAG Boundary Scan MUXes, the
382 clock did not. Clearly this would be a problem.
383
384 However, clocks are very special signals: they have to be distributed
385 evenly to all and any Latches (DFFs) inside the peripheral so that
386 data corruption does not occur because of tiny delays.
387 To avoid that scenario, Clock Domain Crossing (CDC) is used, with
388 Asynchronous FIFOs:
389
390 rx_fifo = stream.AsyncFIFO([("data", 8)], self.rx_depth, w_domain="ulpi", r_domain="sync")
391 tx_fifo = stream.AsyncFIFO([("data", 8)], self.tx_depth, w_domain="sync", r_domain="ulpi")
392 m.submodules.rx_fifo = rx_fifo
393 m.submodules.tx_fifo = tx_fifo
394
395 However the entire FIFO must be covered by two Clock H-Trees: one
396 by the ULPI external clock, and the other the main system clock.
397 The size of the ULPI clock H-Tree, and consequently the size of
398 the PHY on-chip, will result in more Clock Tree Buffers being
399 inserted into the chain, and, correspondingly, matching buffers
400 on the ULPI data input side likewise must be inserted so that
401 the input data timing precisely matches that of its clock.
402
403 The problem is not receiving of data, though: it is transmission
404 on the output ULPI side. With the ULPI Clock Tree having buffers
405 inserted, each buffer creates delay. The ULPI output FIFO has to
406 correspondingly be synchronised not to the original incoming clock
407 but to that clock *after going through H Tree Buffers*. Therefore,
408 there will be a lag on the output data compared to the incoming
409 (external) clock
410
411 # Pinmux GPIO Block
412 The following diagram is an example of a GPIO block with switchable banks and comes from the Ericson presentation on a GPIO architecture.
413 [[!img gpio-block.svg ]]
414
415 The block we are developing is very similar, but is lacking some of configuration of the former (due to complexity and time constraints).
416
417 ## Diagram
418 [[!img banked_gpio_block.jpg size="600x"]]
419
420 *(Diagram is missing the "ie" signal as part of the bundle of signals given to the peripherals, will be updated later)*
421
422 ## Explanation
423 The simple GPIO module is multi-GPIO block integral to the pinmux system.
424 To make the block flexible, it has a variable number of of I/Os based on an
425 input parameter.
426
427 By default, the block is memory-mapped WB bus GPIO. The CPU
428 core can just write the configuration word to the GPIO row address. From this
429 perspective, it is no different to a conventional GPIO block.
430
431 ### Bank Select Options
432 * bank 0 - WB bus has full control (GPIO peripheral)
433 * bank 1,2,3 - WB bus only controls puen/pden, periphal gets o/oe/i/ie (Not
434 fully specified how this should be arranged yet)
435
436 Bank select however, allows to switch over the control of the GPIO block to
437 another peripheral. The peripheral will be given sole connectivity to the
438 o/oe/i/ie signals, while additional parameters such as pull up/down will either
439 be automatically configured (as the case for I2C), or will be configurable
440 via the WB bus. *(This has not been implemented yet, so open to discussion)*
441
442 ## Configuration Word
443 After a discussion with Luke on IRC (14th January 2022), new layout of the
444 8-bit data word for configuring the GPIO (through CSR):
445
446 * oe - Output Enable (see the Ericson presentation for the GPIO diagram)
447 * ie - Input Enable
448 * puen - Pull-Up resistor enable
449 * pden - Pull-Down resistor enable
450 * i/o - When configured as output (oe set), this bit sets/clears output. When
451 configured as input, shows the current state of input (read-only)
452 * bank_sel[2:0] - Bank Select (only 4 banks used)
453
454 ### Simultaneous/Packed Configuration
455 To make the configuration more efficient, multiple GPIOs can be configured with
456 one data word. The number of GPIOs in one "row" is dependent on the width of the
457 WB data bus.
458
459 If for example, the data bus is 64-bits wide, eight GPIO configuration bytes -
460 and thus eight GPIOs - are configured in one go. There is no way to specify
461 which GPIO in a row is configured, so the programmer has to keep the current
462 state of the configuration as part of the code (essentially a shadow register).
463
464 The diagram below shows the layout of the configuration byte, and how it fits
465 within a 64-bit data word.
466
467 [[!img gpio_csr_example.jpg size="600x"]]
468
469 If the block is created with more GPIOs than can fit in a single data word,
470 the next set of GPIOs can be accessed by incrementing the address.
471 For example, if 16 GPIOs are instantiated and 64-bit data bus is used, GPIOs
472 0-7 are accessed via address 0, whereas GPIOs 8-15 are accessed by address 8
473 (TODO: DOES ADDRESS COUNT WORDS OR BYTES?)
474
475 ## Example Memory Map
476 [[!img gpio_memory_example.jpg size="600x"]]
477
478 The diagrams above show the difference in memory layout between 16-GPIO block
479 implemented with 64-bit and 32-bit WB data buses.
480 The 64-bit case shows there are two rows with eight GPIOs in each, and it will
481 take two writes (assuming simple WB write) to completely configure all 16 GPIOs.
482 The 32-bit on the other hand has four address rows, and so will take four write transactions.
483
484 64-bit:
485
486 * 0x00 - Configure GPIOs 0-7
487 * 0x01 - Configure GPIOs 8-15
488
489 32-bit:
490
491 * 0x00 - Configure GPIOs 0-3
492 * 0x01 - Configure GPIOs 4-7
493 * 0x02 - Configure GPIOs 8-11
494 * 0x03 - Configure GPIOs 12-15
495
496
497 ## Combining JTAG BS Chain and Pinmux (In Progress)
498 [[!img io_mux_bank_planning.JPG size="600x"]]
499
500 The JTAG BS chain need to have access to the bank select bits, to allow
501 selecting different peripherals during testing. At the same time, JTAG may
502 also require access to the WB bus to access GPIO configuration options
503 not available to bank 1/2/3 peripherals.
504
505 ### Proposal
506 TODO: REWORK BASED ON GPIO JTAG DIAGRAMS BELOW
507 The proposed JTAG BS chain is as follows:
508
509 * Between each peripheral and GPIO block, add a JTAG BS chain. For example
510 the I2C SDA line will have core o/oe/i/ie, and from JTAG the pad o/oe/i/ie will
511 connect to the GPIO block's ports 1-3.
512 * Provide a test port for the GPIO block that gives full access to configuration
513 (o/oe/i/ie/puen/pden) and bank select. Only allow full JTAG configuration *IF*
514 ban select bit 2 is set!
515 * No JTAG chain between WB bus and GPIO port 0 input *(not sure what to do for
516 this, or whether it is even needed)*.
517
518 Such a setup would allow the JTAG chain to control the bank select when testing
519 connectivity of the peripherals, as well as give full control to the GPIO
520 configuration when bank select bit 2 is set.
521
522 For the purposes of muxing peripherals, bank select bit 2 is ignored. This means
523 that even if JTAG is handed over full control, the peripheral is still connected
524 to the GPIO block (via the BS chain).
525
526 Signals for various ports:
527
528 * WB bus or Periph0: WB data read, data write, address, cyc, stb, ack
529 * Periph1/2/3: o,oe,i,ie (puen/pden are only controlled by WB, test port, or
530 fixed by functionality)
531 * Test port: bank_select[2:0], o,oe,i,ie,puen,pden. In addition, internal
532 address to access individual GPIOs will be available (this will consist of a
533 few bits, as more than 16 GPIOs per block is likely to be to big).
534
535 As you can see by the above list, the GPIO block is becoming quite a complex
536 beast. If there are suggestions to simplify or reduce some of the signals,
537 that will be helpful.*
538
539 The diagrams below show 1-bit GPIO connectivity, as well as the 4-bit case.
540
541 [[!img gpio_jtag_1bit.jpg size="600x"]]
542
543 [[!img gpio_jtag_4bit.jpg size="600x"]]
544
545 # Core/Pad Connection + JTAG Mux
546
547 Diagram constructed from the nmigen plat.py file.
548
549 [[!img i_o_io_tristate_jtag.svg ]]
550