9bd062050ff501aade10c8de0f1f5c0525089357
[libreriscv.git] / openpower / sv / setvl.mdwn
1 [[!tag standards]]
2
3 # OpenPOWER SV setvl/setvli
4
5 See links:
6
7 * <http://lists.libre-soc.org/pipermail/libre-soc-dev/2020-November/001366.html>
8 * <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535>
9 * <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568> TODO
10 * <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec/blob/master/v-spec.adoc#vsetvlivsetvl-instructions>
11
12 Use of setvl results in changes to the MVL, VL and STATE SPRs. see [[sv/sprs]]♧
13
14 # Behaviour and Rationale
15
16 SV's Vector Engine is based on Cray-style Variable-length Vectorisation,
17 just like RVV. However unlike RVV, SV sits on top of the standard Scalar
18 regfiles: there is no separate Vector register numbering. Therefore, also
19 unlike RVV, SV does not have hard-coded "Lanes". The relevant parameter
20 in RVV is "MAXVL" and this is architecturally hard-coded into RVV systems,
21 anywhere from 1 to tens of thousands of Lanes in supercomputers.
22
23 SV is more like how MMX used to sit on top of the x86 FP regfile. Therefore
24 when Vector operations are performed, the question has to be asked, "well,
25 how much of the regfile do you want to allocate to this operation?" because if it is too small an amount performance may be affected, and if too large then other registers would overlap and cause data corruption, or even if allocated correctly would require spill to memory.
26
27 The answer effectively needs to be parameterised. Hence: MAXVL
28 (MVL) is set from an immediate, so that the compiler may decide, statically, a guaranteed resource allocation according to the needs of the application.
29
30 Other than being able to set MVL, SV's VL (Vector Length) works just like RVV's VL, with one minor twist. RVV permits the `setvl` instruction to set VL to an arbitrary value. Given that RVV only works on Vector Loops, this is fine and part of its value and design. However, SV sits on top of the standard register files. When MVL=VL=2, a Vector Add on `r3` will perform two Scalar Adds: one on `r3` and one on `r4`.
31
32 Thus there is the opportunity to set VL to an explicit value (within the limits of MVL) with the reasonable expectation that if two operations are requested (by setting VL=2) then two operations are guaranteed. This avoids the need for a loop (with not-insignificant use of the regfiles for counters), simply two
33 instructions:
34
35 setvli r0, MVL=64, VL=64
36 ld r0.v, 0(r30) # load 64 registers from memory
37
38 Page Faults etc. aside this is *guaranteed* 100% without fail to perform 64 unit-strided LDs starting from the address pointed to by r30 and put the contents into r0 through r63. Thus it becomes a "LOAD-MULTI". Twin Predication could even be used to only load relevant registers from the stack. This *only works if VL is set to the requested value* (caveat being, limited to not exceed MVL)
39
40 # Format
41
42 *(Allocation of opcode TBD pending OPF ISA WG approval)*
43
44 | 0.5|6.10|11.15|16.20| 21..24.25 | 26...30 |31| name |
45 | -- | -- | --- | --- | ----------- | ------- |--| ------- |
46 | 19 | RT | RA | | XO[0:4] | XO[5:9] |Rc| XL-Form |
47 | 19 | RT | RA | imm | i // vs ms | NNNNN |Rc| setvl |
48
49 Note that imm spans 7 bits (16 to 22), and that bit 22 is reserved and must be zero. Setting bit 22 causes an illegal exception.
50
51 Note that in immediate setting mode VL and MVL start from **one** i.e. that an immediate value of zero will result in VL/MVL being set to 1. 0b111111 results in VL/MVL being set to 64. This is because setting VL/MVL to 1 results in "scalar identity" behaviour, where setting VL/MVL to 0 would result in all Vector operations becoming `nop`. If this is truly desired (nop behaviour) then setting VL and MVL to zero is to be done via the [[SV SPRs|sv/sprs]]
52
53 Note that setmvli is a pseudo-op, based on RA/RT=0, and setvli likewise
54
55 setvli VL=8 : setvl r5, r0, VL=8
56 setmvli MVL=8 : setvl r0, r0, MVL=8
57
58 Additional pseudo-op for obtaining VL without modifying it:
59
60 getvl r5 : setvl r5, r0, vs=0, ms=0
61
62 Note that whilst it is possible to set both MVL and VL from the same immediate, it is not possible to set them to different immediates in the same instruction. That would require two instructions.
63
64 # Pseudocode
65
66 // instruction fields:
67 rd = get_rt_field(); // bits 6..10
68 ra = get_ra_field(); // bits 11..15
69 vs = get_vs_field(); // bit 24
70 ms = get_ms_field(); // bit 25
71 Rc = get_Rc_field(); // bit 31
72 // add one. MVL/VL=1..64 not 0..63
73 vlimmed = get_immed_field()+1; // 16..22
74
75 // set VL (or not).
76 // 3 options: from SPR, from immed, from ra
77 if vs {
78 // VL to be sourced from fields/regs
79 if ra != 0 {
80 VL = GPR[ra]
81 } else {
82 VL = vlimmed
83 }
84 } else {
85 // VL not to change (except if MVL is reduced)
86 // read from SPRs
87 VL = SPR[SV_VL]
88 }
89
90 // set MVL (or not).
91 // 2 options: from SPR, from immed
92 if ms {
93 MVL = vlimmed
94 } else {
95 // MVL not to change, read from SPRs
96 MVL = SPR[SV_MVL]
97 }
98
99 // calculate (limit) VL
100 VL = min(VL, MVL)
101
102 // store VL, MVL
103 SPR[SV_VL] = VL
104 SPR[SV_MVL] = MVL
105
106 // write rd
107 if rt != 0 {
108 // rt is not zero
109 regs[rt] = VL;
110 }
111 // write CR?
112 if Rc {
113 // update CR from VL (not rt)
114 CR0.eq = (VL == 0)
115 ...
116 ...
117 }
118
119 # Examples
120
121 ## Core concept loop
122
123 loop:
124 setvl a3, a0, MVL=8 # update a3 with vl
125 # (# of elements this iteration)
126 # set MVL to 8
127 # do vector operations at up to 8 length (MVL=8)
128 # ...
129 sub a0, a0, a3 # Decrement count by vl
130 bnez a0, loop # Any more?
131
132 ## Loop using Rc=1
133
134 my_fn:
135 li r3, 1000
136 b test
137 loop:
138 sub r3, r3, r4
139 ...
140 test:
141 setvli. r4, r3, MVL=64
142 bne cr0, loop
143 end:
144 blr