2 * Copyright © 2012 Intel Corporation
4 * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
5 * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
6 * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
7 * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
8 * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
9 * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
11 * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
12 * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
15 * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
16 * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
17 * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
18 * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
19 * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
20 * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
24 * Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
29 #include "brw_fs_live_variables.h"
33 /** @file brw_fs_live_variables.cpp
35 * Support for computing at the basic block level which variables
36 * (virtual GRFs in our case) are live at entry and exit.
38 * See Muchnik's Advanced Compiler Design and Implementation, section
43 * Sets up the use[] and def[] arrays.
45 * The basic-block-level live variable analysis needs to know which
46 * variables get used before they're completely defined, and which
47 * variables are completely defined before they're used.
50 fs_live_variables::setup_def_use()
54 for (int b
= 0; b
< cfg
->num_blocks
; b
++) {
55 bblock_t
*block
= cfg
->blocks
[b
];
57 assert(ip
== block
->start_ip
);
59 assert(cfg
->blocks
[b
- 1]->end_ip
== ip
- 1);
61 for (fs_inst
*inst
= (fs_inst
*)block
->start
;
62 inst
!= block
->end
->next
;
63 inst
= (fs_inst
*)inst
->next
) {
65 /* Set use[] for this instruction */
66 for (unsigned int i
= 0; i
< 3; i
++) {
67 if (inst
->src
[i
].file
== GRF
) {
68 int reg
= inst
->src
[i
].reg
;
71 bd
[b
].use
[reg
] = true;
75 /* Check for unconditional writes to whole registers. These
76 * are the things that screen off preceding definitions of a
77 * variable, and thus qualify for being in def[].
79 if (inst
->dst
.file
== GRF
&&
80 inst
->regs_written() == v
->virtual_grf_sizes
[inst
->dst
.reg
] &&
82 !inst
->force_uncompressed
&&
83 !inst
->force_sechalf
) {
84 int reg
= inst
->dst
.reg
;
86 bd
[b
].def
[reg
] = true;
95 * The algorithm incrementally sets bits in liveout and livein,
96 * propagating it through control flow. It will eventually terminate
97 * because it only ever adds bits, and stops when no bits are added in
101 fs_live_variables::compute_live_variables()
108 for (int b
= 0; b
< cfg
->num_blocks
; b
++) {
110 for (int i
= 0; i
< num_vars
; i
++) {
111 if (bd
[b
].use
[i
] || (bd
[b
].liveout
[i
] && !bd
[b
].def
[i
])) {
112 if (!bd
[b
].livein
[i
]) {
113 bd
[b
].livein
[i
] = true;
120 foreach_list(block_node
, &cfg
->blocks
[b
]->children
) {
121 bblock_link
*link
= (bblock_link
*)block_node
;
122 bblock_t
*block
= link
->block
;
124 for (int i
= 0; i
< num_vars
; i
++) {
125 if (bd
[block
->block_num
].livein
[i
] && !bd
[b
].liveout
[i
]) {
126 bd
[b
].liveout
[i
] = true;
135 fs_live_variables::fs_live_variables(fs_visitor
*v
, cfg_t
*cfg
)
138 mem_ctx
= ralloc_context(cfg
->mem_ctx
);
140 num_vars
= v
->virtual_grf_count
;
141 bd
= rzalloc_array(mem_ctx
, struct block_data
, cfg
->num_blocks
);
143 for (int i
= 0; i
< cfg
->num_blocks
; i
++) {
144 bd
[i
].def
= rzalloc_array(mem_ctx
, bool, num_vars
);
145 bd
[i
].use
= rzalloc_array(mem_ctx
, bool, num_vars
);
146 bd
[i
].livein
= rzalloc_array(mem_ctx
, bool, num_vars
);
147 bd
[i
].liveout
= rzalloc_array(mem_ctx
, bool, num_vars
);
151 compute_live_variables();
154 fs_live_variables::~fs_live_variables()
156 ralloc_free(mem_ctx
);
159 #define MAX_INSTRUCTION (1 << 30)
162 fs_visitor::calculate_live_intervals()
164 int num_vars
= this->virtual_grf_count
;
166 if (this->live_intervals_valid
)
169 int *def
= ralloc_array(mem_ctx
, int, num_vars
);
170 int *use
= ralloc_array(mem_ctx
, int, num_vars
);
171 ralloc_free(this->virtual_grf_def
);
172 ralloc_free(this->virtual_grf_use
);
173 this->virtual_grf_def
= def
;
174 this->virtual_grf_use
= use
;
176 for (int i
= 0; i
< num_vars
; i
++) {
177 def
[i
] = MAX_INSTRUCTION
;
181 /* Start by setting up the intervals with no knowledge of control
185 foreach_list(node
, &this->instructions
) {
186 fs_inst
*inst
= (fs_inst
*)node
;
188 for (unsigned int i
= 0; i
< 3; i
++) {
189 if (inst
->src
[i
].file
== GRF
) {
190 int reg
= inst
->src
[i
].reg
;
194 /* In most cases, a register can be written over safely by the
195 * same instruction that is its last use. For a single
196 * instruction, the sources are dereferenced before writing of the
197 * destination starts (naturally). This gets more complicated for
198 * simd16, because the instruction:
200 * mov(16) g4<1>F g4<8,8,1>F g6<8,8,1>F
202 * is actually decoded in hardware as:
204 * mov(8) g4<1>F g4<8,8,1>F g6<8,8,1>F
205 * mov(8) g5<1>F g5<8,8,1>F g7<8,8,1>F
207 * Which is safe. However, if we have uniform accesses
208 * happening, we get into trouble:
210 * mov(8) g4<1>F g4<0,1,0>F g6<8,8,1>F
211 * mov(8) g5<1>F g4<0,1,0>F g7<8,8,1>F
213 * Now our destination for the first instruction overwrote the
214 * second instruction's src0, and we get garbage for those 8
215 * pixels. There's a similar issue for the pre-gen6
216 * pixel_x/pixel_y, which are registers of 16-bit values and thus
217 * would get stomped by the first decode as well.
219 if (dispatch_width
== 16 && (inst
->src
[i
].smear
||
220 (this->pixel_x
.reg
== reg
||
221 this->pixel_y
.reg
== reg
))) {
227 if (inst
->dst
.file
== GRF
) {
228 int reg
= inst
->dst
.reg
;
230 def
[reg
] = MIN2(def
[reg
], ip
);
236 /* Now, extend those intervals using our analysis of control flow. */
238 fs_live_variables
livevars(this, &cfg
);
240 for (int b
= 0; b
< cfg
.num_blocks
; b
++) {
241 for (int i
= 0; i
< num_vars
; i
++) {
242 if (livevars
.bd
[b
].livein
[i
]) {
243 def
[i
] = MIN2(def
[i
], cfg
.blocks
[b
]->start_ip
);
244 use
[i
] = MAX2(use
[i
], cfg
.blocks
[b
]->start_ip
);
247 if (livevars
.bd
[b
].liveout
[i
]) {
248 def
[i
] = MIN2(def
[i
], cfg
.blocks
[b
]->end_ip
);
249 use
[i
] = MAX2(use
[i
], cfg
.blocks
[b
]->end_ip
);
254 this->live_intervals_valid
= true;
256 /* Note in the non-control-flow code above, that we only take def[] as the
257 * first store, and use[] as the last use. We use this in dead code
258 * elimination, to determine when a store never gets used. However, we
259 * also use these arrays to answer the virtual_grf_interferes() question
260 * (live interval analysis), which is used for register coalescing and
261 * register allocation.
263 * So, there's a conflict over what the array should mean: if use[]
264 * considers a def after the last use, then the dead code elimination pass
265 * never does anything (and it's an important pass!). But if we don't
266 * include dead code, then virtual_grf_interferes() lies and we'll do
267 * horrible things like coalesce the register that is dead-code-written
268 * into another register that was live across the dead write (causing the
269 * use of the second register to take the dead write's source value instead
270 * of the coalesced MOV's source value).
272 * To resolve the conflict, immediately after calculating live intervals,
273 * detect dead code, nuke it, and if we changed anything, calculate again
274 * before returning to the caller. Now we happen to produce def[] and
275 * use[] arrays that will work for virtual_grf_interferes().
277 if (dead_code_eliminate())
278 calculate_live_intervals();
282 fs_visitor::virtual_grf_interferes(int a
, int b
)
284 int a_def
= this->virtual_grf_def
[a
], a_use
= this->virtual_grf_use
[a
];
285 int b_def
= this->virtual_grf_def
[b
], b_use
= this->virtual_grf_use
[b
];
287 /* If there's dead code (def but not use), it would break our test
288 * unless we consider it used.
290 if ((a_use
== -1 && a_def
!= MAX_INSTRUCTION
) ||
291 (b_use
== -1 && b_def
!= MAX_INSTRUCTION
)) {
295 int start
= MAX2(a_def
, b_def
);
296 int end
= MIN2(a_use
, b_use
);