# Example Dependency Matrix Layouts # Scalar with Vector "Lanes" See | FU-REGS -| r0 | r1 | r2 | r3 | r4 | r5 | r6 | r7 | FU-FU | L0A0 | L1A0 | L2A0 | L3A0 | L0A1 | L1A2 | L2A1 | L3A1 | SA1 | SA2 | SL1 | SL2 | |----------|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|--------|------|------|----- |------|------|------|------|------|-----|-----|-----|-----| |V\_L0\_ALU0| y | | | | y | | | | -> | y | | | | y | | | | ? | ? | ? | ? | |V\_L1\_ALU0| | y | | | | y | | | -> | | y | | | | y | | | ? | ? | ? | ? | |V\_L2\_ALU0| | | y | | | | y | | -> | | | y | | | | y | | ? | ? | ? | ? | |V\_L3\_ALU0| | | | y | | | | y | -> | | | | y | | | | y | ? | ? | ? | ? | |V\_L0\_ALU1| y | | | | y | | | | -> | y | | | | y | | | | ? | ? | ? | ? | |V\_L1\_ALU1| | y | | | | y | | | -> | | y | | | | y | | | ? | ? | ? | ? | |V\_L2\_ALU1| | | y | | | | y | | -> | | | y | | | | y | | ? | ? | ? | ? | |V\_L3\_ALU1| | | | y | | | | y | -> | | | | y | | | | y | ? | ? | ? | ? | |S\_ALU1 | y | y | y | y | y | y | y | y | -> | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | y | y | y | y | |S\_ALU2 | y | y | y | y | y | y | y | y | -> | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | y | y | y | y | |S\_LOGIC1 | y | y | y | y | y | y | y | y | -> | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | y | y | y | y | |S\_LOGIC2 | y | y | y | y | y | y | y | y | -> | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | y | y | y | y | Register allocation associated with this DM layout: Vectors may *only* be allocated to Vector FPs if RA%4 == RB%4 == RT%4 and all reg numbers are over 32. otherwise they are allocated to *scalar* FUs which has significantly less computational resources but far greater crossbar routing. This allows 4R1W regfiles to be used where normally ultra-costly 12R10W would be required.