projects
/
libreriscv.git
/ blobdiff
commit
grep
author
committer
pickaxe
?
search:
re
summary
|
shortlog
|
log
|
commit
|
commitdiff
|
tree
raw
|
inline
| side by side
update meeting notes
[libreriscv.git]
/
charter.mdwn
diff --git
a/charter.mdwn
b/charter.mdwn
index f1ebc5fa2d3419c52874e68223a3c96d1bfa2908..b7b69da780558ebdd41b320d8bab3d23720d4265 100644
(file)
--- a/
charter.mdwn
+++ b/
charter.mdwn
@@
-1,7
+1,7
@@
-# Libre-
RISCV
Charter Agreement
+# Libre-
SOC
Charter Agreement
* Draft Status (v0)
* Draft Status (v0)
-* Last Edited:
22 Sep
2019
+* Last Edited:
11 Aug
2019
This document is based on the Titanian's "Code of Honour" and on
the Systemic Laws of Organisations, listed in "Invisible Dynamics".
This document is based on the Titanian's "Code of Honour" and on
the Systemic Laws of Organisations, listed in "Invisible Dynamics".
@@
-39,10
+39,10
@@
to grow and be part of the group.
expertise.
* Everyone acknowledges and accepts their role and seniority, and in turn
acknowledge and accept the role and seniority of others.
expertise.
* Everyone acknowledges and accepts their role and seniority, and in turn
acknowledge and accept the role and seniority of others.
-* The responsibility to those w
e serve
, when we take on a role of
+* The responsibility to those w
ho depend on us
, when we take on a role of
responsibility and power, is acknowledged and accepted.
* Everyone is rewarded equitably for their contributions.
responsibility and power, is acknowledged and accepted.
* Everyone is rewarded equitably for their contributions.
-* Everyone is responsible - and accountable - for their actions
;
good and bad,
+* Everyone is responsible - and accountable - for their actions
:
good and bad,
"Guilt" and "Merit" belong with whoever earned them.
Further explanation can be found in [[discussion]].
"Guilt" and "Merit" belong with whoever earned them.
Further explanation can be found in [[discussion]].
@@
-55,5
+55,8
@@
Further explanation can be found in [[discussion]].
involved in decisions
* Only after agreement may new contributors propose changes (which will require
unanimous agreement to implement)
involved in decisions
* Only after agreement may new contributors propose changes (which will require
unanimous agreement to implement)
+* In recognition of the fact that unanimous decision-making slows down
+ productivity above around 8-9 people, the appropriate way to handle that
+ is to "delegate" (divide and conquer).
Further explanation can be found in [[discussion]].
Further explanation can be found in [[discussion]].