- add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
- VAR_NAMESPACE, LOC_STATIC,
- &objfile->static_psymbols,
- 0, CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE,
- psymtab_language, objfile);
- continue;
- case 'G':
- CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE += ANOFFSET (section_offsets, SECT_OFF_DATA);
- /* The addresses in these entries are reported to be
- wrong. See the code that reads 'G's for symtabs. */
- add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
- VAR_NAMESPACE, LOC_STATIC,
- &objfile->global_psymbols,
- 0, CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE,
- psymtab_language, objfile);
- continue;
-
- case 'T':
- if (p != namestring) /* a name is there, not just :T... */
- {
- add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
- STRUCT_NAMESPACE, LOC_TYPEDEF,
- &objfile->static_psymbols,
- CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE, 0,
- psymtab_language, objfile);
- if (p[2] == 't')
- {
- /* Also a typedef with the same name. */
- add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
- VAR_NAMESPACE, LOC_TYPEDEF,
- &objfile->static_psymbols,
- CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE, 0,
- psymtab_language, objfile);
- p += 1;
- }
- /* The semantics of C++ state that "struct foo { ... }"
- also defines a typedef for "foo". Unfortuantely, cfront
- never makes the typedef when translating from C++ to C.
- We make the typedef here so that "ptype foo" works as
- expected for cfront translated code. */
- else if (psymtab_language == language_cplus)
- {
- /* Also a typedef with the same name. */
- add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
- VAR_NAMESPACE, LOC_TYPEDEF,
- &objfile->static_psymbols,
- CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE, 0,
- psymtab_language, objfile);
- }
- }
- goto check_enum;
- case 't':
- if (p != namestring) /* a name is there, not just :T... */
- {
- add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
- VAR_NAMESPACE, LOC_TYPEDEF,
- &objfile->static_psymbols,
- CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE, 0,
- psymtab_language, objfile);
- }
- check_enum:
- /* If this is an enumerated type, we need to
- add all the enum constants to the partial symbol
- table. This does not cover enums without names, e.g.
- "enum {a, b} c;" in C, but fortunately those are
- rare. There is no way for GDB to find those from the
- enum type without spending too much time on it. Thus
- to solve this problem, the compiler needs to put out the
- enum in a nameless type. GCC2 does this. */
-
- /* We are looking for something of the form
- <name> ":" ("t" | "T") [<number> "="] "e"
- {<constant> ":" <value> ","} ";". */
-
- /* Skip over the colon and the 't' or 'T'. */
- p += 2;
- /* This type may be given a number. Also, numbers can come
- in pairs like (0,26). Skip over it. */
- while ((*p >= '0' && *p <= '9')
- || *p == '(' || *p == ',' || *p == ')'
- || *p == '=')
+ add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
+ VAR_NAMESPACE, LOC_STATIC,
+ &objfile->static_psymbols,
+ 0, CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE,
+ psymtab_language, objfile);
+ continue;
+ case 'G':
+ CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE += ANOFFSET (objfile->section_offsets, SECT_OFF_DATA (objfile));
+ /* The addresses in these entries are reported to be
+ wrong. See the code that reads 'G's for symtabs. */
+ add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
+ VAR_NAMESPACE, LOC_STATIC,
+ &objfile->global_psymbols,
+ 0, CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE,
+ psymtab_language, objfile);
+ continue;
+
+ case 'T':
+ /* When a 'T' entry is defining an anonymous enum, it
+ may have a name which is the empty string, or a
+ single space. Since they're not really defining a
+ symbol, those shouldn't go in the partial symbol
+ table. We do pick up the elements of such enums at
+ 'check_enum:', below. */
+ if (p >= namestring + 2
+ || (p == namestring + 1
+ && namestring[0] != ' '))
+ {
+ add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
+ STRUCT_NAMESPACE, LOC_TYPEDEF,
+ &objfile->static_psymbols,
+ CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE, 0,
+ psymtab_language, objfile);
+ if (p[2] == 't')
+ {
+ /* Also a typedef with the same name. */
+ add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
+ VAR_NAMESPACE, LOC_TYPEDEF,
+ &objfile->static_psymbols,
+ CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE, 0,
+ psymtab_language, objfile);
+ p += 1;
+ }
+ /* The semantics of C++ state that "struct foo { ... }"
+ also defines a typedef for "foo". Unfortuantely, cfront
+ never makes the typedef when translating from C++ to C.
+ We make the typedef here so that "ptype foo" works as
+ expected for cfront translated code. */
+ else if (psymtab_language == language_cplus)
+ {
+ /* Also a typedef with the same name. */
+ add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
+ VAR_NAMESPACE, LOC_TYPEDEF,
+ &objfile->static_psymbols,
+ CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE, 0,
+ psymtab_language, objfile);
+ }
+ }
+ goto check_enum;
+ case 't':
+ if (p != namestring) /* a name is there, not just :T... */
+ {
+ add_psymbol_to_list (namestring, p - namestring,
+ VAR_NAMESPACE, LOC_TYPEDEF,
+ &objfile->static_psymbols,
+ CUR_SYMBOL_VALUE, 0,
+ psymtab_language, objfile);
+ }
+ check_enum:
+ /* If this is an enumerated type, we need to
+ add all the enum constants to the partial symbol
+ table. This does not cover enums without names, e.g.
+ "enum {a, b} c;" in C, but fortunately those are
+ rare. There is no way for GDB to find those from the
+ enum type without spending too much time on it. Thus
+ to solve this problem, the compiler needs to put out the
+ enum in a nameless type. GCC2 does this. */
+
+ /* We are looking for something of the form
+ <name> ":" ("t" | "T") [<number> "="] "e"
+ {<constant> ":" <value> ","} ";". */
+
+ /* Skip over the colon and the 't' or 'T'. */
+ p += 2;
+ /* This type may be given a number. Also, numbers can come
+ in pairs like (0,26). Skip over it. */
+ while ((*p >= '0' && *p <= '9')
+ || *p == '(' || *p == ',' || *p == ')'
+ || *p == '=')
+ p++;
+
+ if (*p++ == 'e')
+ {
+ /* The aix4 compiler emits extra crud before the members. */
+ if (*p == '-')
+ {
+ /* Skip over the type (?). */
+ while (*p != ':')
+ p++;
+
+ /* Skip over the colon. */