fosdem2024_bigint: improve sv.adde diagram

[libreriscv.git] / why_a_libresoc.mdwn

diff --git a/why_a_libresoc.mdwn b/why_a_libresoc.mdwn
index 069f43176b5c5b800b9703e4f5ea744d35eb92c9..88e84944218ce98a70e1211611a31c32c7d0bf11 100644 (file)
--- a/why_a_libresoc.mdwn
+++ b/why_a_libresoc.mdwn
@@ -2,7 +2,11 @@
 
 ## TLDR
 
 
 ## TLDR
 

-We believe a computer should be safe to use, and this starts with a safe processor.
+We believe a computer should be safe to use, and this starts with a open processor.
+
+We also believe that an open processor doesn't mean a weak processor.
+
+Check out our [mission](../The_Mission).

 
 ## The Lengthier Explanation...
 
 
 ## The Lengthier Explanation...
 


@@ -12,7 +16,7 @@ There are entire [dissertations](http://www.kroening.com/diss/diss-kroe.pdf) ded
 
 Given the fact that performant bug-free processors no longer exist [1][2], how can you trust your processor [3]? The next best thing is to have access to a processor’s design files. Not only have access to them, you must have the freedom to study, improve them, run the test suites and be able to improve those too.
 
 
 Given the fact that performant bug-free processors no longer exist [1][2], how can you trust your processor [3]? The next best thing is to have access to a processor’s design files. Not only have access to them, you must have the freedom to study, improve them, run the test suites and be able to improve those too.
 

-Not only that, you and everyone who has a stake in the success needs to be entirely free from NDAs and other restrictions which prevent and prohibit communication.  An example: although you yourself might not have the technical capability to review our SoC, you can always find a third party to pay wjo can.  However if the source code was under NDA, do you think that would be practical to consider?
+Not only that, you and everyone who has a stake in the success needs to be entirely free from NDAs and other restrictions which prevent and prohibit communication.  An example: although you yourself might not have the technical capability to review our SoC, you can always find a third party to pay those who can.  However if the source code was under NDA, do you think that would be practical to consider?

 
 *Collaboration, not competition*.
 
 
 *Collaboration, not competition*.