daily update

[binutils-gdb.git] / bfd / elfxx-tilegx.c

diff --git a/bfd/elfxx-tilegx.c b/bfd/elfxx-tilegx.c
index b28d1a875a5dc608bb2d8dd7198655655d969f98..cd92bf9a8752340b86df92023abfb91f85d0cbc3 100644 (file)
--- a/bfd/elfxx-tilegx.c
+++ b/bfd/elfxx-tilegx.c
@@ -2107,11 +2107,33 @@ tilegx_elf_gc_mark_hook (asection *sec,
   if (h != NULL)
     {
       switch (TILEGX_ELF_R_TYPE (rel->r_info))
-      {
-      case R_TILEGX_GNU_VTINHERIT:
-      case R_TILEGX_GNU_VTENTRY:
-       break;
-      }
+       {
+       case R_TILEGX_GNU_VTINHERIT:
+       case R_TILEGX_GNU_VTENTRY:
+         return NULL;
+       }
+    }
+
+  /* FIXME: The test here, in check_relocs and in relocate_section
+     dealing with TLS optimization, ought to be !info->executable.  */
+  if (info->shared)
+    {
+      switch (TILEGX_ELF_R_TYPE (rel->r_info))
+       {
+       case R_TILEGX_TLS_GD_CALL:
+         /* This reloc implicitly references __tls_get_addr.  We know
+            another reloc will reference the same symbol as the one
+            on this reloc, so the real symbol and section will be
+            gc marked when processing the other reloc.  That lets
+            us handle __tls_get_addr here.  */
+         h = elf_link_hash_lookup (elf_hash_table (info), "__tls_get_addr",
+                                   FALSE, FALSE, TRUE);
+         BFD_ASSERT (h != NULL);
+         h->mark = 1;
+         if (h->u.weakdef != NULL)
+           h->u.weakdef->mark = 1;
+         sym = NULL;
+       }
     }
 
   return _bfd_elf_gc_mark_hook (sec, info, rel, h, sym);