bug 1048, ls011: Add FP Store Shifted Post-Update section

[libreriscv.git] / charter / discussion.mdwn

diff --git a/charter/discussion.mdwn b/charter/discussion.mdwn
index c01c1a82316739215cce6e3e38cb51514a7bd4c1..75d74b35d79f1bb0d5d8350545ca4ace67e2e09e 100644 (file)
--- a/charter/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/charter/discussion.mdwn
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 # Discussion and commentary on Libre-SOC Member Agreement
 
+The Charter is explained further here: please feel free to edit
+and add comments at the end sections
+
 # The Code of Honour
 
 It's called a Code of "Honour", not a Code of "Conduct", for a reason.
@@ -24,6 +27,11 @@ trust you, empower you, and require you, to act responsibly",
 for the benefit of all, including yourself, as part of this
 Organisation.
 
+Here we illustrate with the obligatory Dilbert cartoons the
+polar opposite of a reasonable Code.
+
+<img src="https://assets.amuniversal.com/7378df606cc701301d50001dd8b71c47" width="400" />
+
 # The Systemic Laws of Organisations.
 
 The Systemic Laws are explained below.
@@ -67,14 +75,16 @@ by example of how you *don't* want things to continue in the future.
 This can be very challenging, particularly when someone with more expertise
 meets someone whose length of service is greater.
 
-<img src="https://assets.amuniversal.com/20143ef09e02012f2fe500163e41dd5b" width="400" />
+<img src="https://assets.amuniversal.com/d06a1270a06a012f2fe600163e41dd5b" width="400" />
 
 ## We accept the responsibility of our position
 
 If we choose a position of responsibility, we must actually acknowledge and
 accept the responsibility of that role!  People will be relying on us.
 
-<img src="https://assets.amuniversal.com/de754040f11401382b97005056a9545d" width="400" />
+<img src="https://assets.amuniversal.com/9d7569a09f8f012f2fe600163e41dd5b" width="400" />
+
+<!-- img src="https://assets.amuniversal.com/de754040f11401382b97005056a9545d" width="400"  -->
 
 ## Everyone is rewarded equitably for their contributions
 
@@ -133,3 +143,7 @@ It is also worthwhile noting on the subject of unanimous decision-making:
 its effectiveness decreases as the number of contributors goes significantly
 above around eight.  If that occurs, delegate!  Form sub-projects, agree
 roles and responsibilities, and go for it.  Divide and conquer.
+
+# Questions / Comments
+
+Add here.