i965/blorp: Fix integer downsampling on Gen7.

[mesa.git] / docs / dispatch.html

diff --git a/docs/dispatch.html b/docs/dispatch.html
index 1d3283aa6ccf7b2ddee34a1694fce2d285834719..e40b41a60bb7fd8e88222cd0661f66de8be318b9 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/dispatch.html
+++ b/docs/dispatch.html
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
 <p>Several factors combine to make efficient dispatch of OpenGL functions
 fairly complicated.  This document attempts to explain some of the issues
 and introduce the reader to Mesa's implementation.  Readers already familiar
-with the issues around GL dispatch can safely skip ahead to the <A
-HREF="#overview">overview of Mesa's implementation</A>.</p>
+with the issues around GL dispatch can safely skip ahead to the <a
+href="#overview">overview of Mesa's implementation</a>.</p>
 
-<H2>1. Complexity of GL Dispatch</H2>
+<h2>1. Complexity of GL Dispatch</h2>
 
 <p>Every GL application has at least one object called a GL <em>context</em>.
 This object, which is an implicit parameter to ever GL function, stores all
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ table.</li>
 void glVertex3f(GLfloat x, GLfloat y, GLfloat z)
 {
     const struct _glapi_table * const dispatch = GET_DISPATCH();
-    
+
     (*dispatch-&gt;Vertex3f)(x, y, z);
 }</pre></td></tr>
 <tr><td>Sample dispatch function</td></tr></table>
@@ -89,14 +89,14 @@ overhead that it adds to every GL function call.</p>
 similar function.  Mesa provides a wrapper function called
 <tt>_glapi_get_dispatch</tt> that is used by default.</p>
 
-<H2>3. Optimizations</H2>
+<h2>3. Optimizations</h2>
 
 <p>A number of optimizations have been made over the years to diminish the
 performance hit imposed by GL dispatch.  This section describes these
 optimizations.  The benefits of each optimization and the situations where
 each can or cannot be used are listed.</p>
 
-<H3>3.1. Dual dispatch table pointers</H3>
+<h3>3.1. Dual dispatch table pointers</h3>
 
 <p>The vast majority of OpenGL applications use the API in a single threaded
 manner.  That is, the application has only one thread that makes calls into
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ the common case.</p>
 <tr><td>Improved <tt>GET_DISPATCH</tt> Implementation</td></tr></table>
 </blockquote>
 
-<H3>3.2. ELF TLS</H3>
+<h3>3.2. ELF TLS</h3>
 
 <p>Starting with the 2.4.20 Linux kernel, each thread is allocated an area
 of per-thread, global storage.  Variables can be put in this area using some
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ extern __thread struct _glapi_table *_glapi_tls_Dispatch
 <tt>GLX_USE_TLS</tt>.  Any platform capable of using TLS should use this as
 the default dispatch method.</p>
 
-<H3>3.3. Assembly Language Dispatch Stubs</H3>
+<h3>3.3. Assembly Language Dispatch Stubs</h3>
 
 <p>Many platforms has difficulty properly optimizing the tail-call in the
 dispatch stubs.  Platforms like x86 that pass parameters on the stack seem
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ routines are very short, and it is trivial to create optimal assembly
 language versions.  The amount of optimization provided by using assembly
 stubs varies from platform to platform and application to application.
 However, by using the assembly stubs, many platforms can use an additional
-space optimization (see <A HREF="#fixedsize">below</A>).</p>
+space optimization (see <a href="#fixedsize">below</a>).</p>
 
 <p>The biggest hurdle to creating assembly stubs is handling the various
 ways that the dispatch table pointer can be accessed.  There are four
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ implementation of each function.  This makes the assembly file considerably
 larger (e.g., 29,332 lines for <tt>glapi_x86-64.S</tt> versus 1,155 lines for
 <tt>glapi_x86.S</tt>) and causes simple changes to the function
 implementation to generate many lines of diffs.  Since the assmebly files
-are typically generated by scripts (see <A HREF="#autogen">below</A>), this
+are typically generated by scripts (see <a href="#autogen">below</a>), this
 isn't a significant problem.</p>
 
 <p>Once a new assembly file is created, it must be inserted in the build