tree.c (decl_init_priority_insert): Don't create entry for default priority.

[gcc.git] / gcc / tree.c

diff --git a/gcc/tree.c b/gcc/tree.c
index 69d5ecbb700c58a0d6a96dd9098562ef20d1fd3f..eec4a8b290580adfccc264a7b548e11aa1c56a5f 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/tree.c
+++ b/gcc/tree.c
@@ -5913,6 +5913,8 @@ decl_init_priority_insert (tree decl, priority_type priority)
   struct tree_priority_map *h;
 
   gcc_assert (VAR_OR_FUNCTION_DECL_P (decl));
+  if (priority == DEFAULT_INIT_PRIORITY)
+    return;
   h = decl_priority_info (decl);
   h->init = priority;
 }
@@ -5925,6 +5927,8 @@ decl_fini_priority_insert (tree decl, priority_type priority)
   struct tree_priority_map *h;
 
   gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL);
+  if (priority == DEFAULT_INIT_PRIORITY)
+    return;
   h = decl_priority_info (decl);
   h->fini = priority;
 }
@@ -9893,50 +9897,6 @@ needs_to_live_in_memory (const_tree t)
              && aggregate_value_p (t, current_function_decl)));
 }
 
-/* There are situations in which a language considers record types
-   compatible which have different field lists.  Decide if two fields
-   are compatible.  It is assumed that the parent records are compatible.  */
-
-bool
-fields_compatible_p (const_tree f1, const_tree f2)
-{
-  if (!operand_equal_p (DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET (f1),
-                       DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET (f2), OEP_ONLY_CONST))
-    return false;
-
-  if (!operand_equal_p (DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (f1),
-                        DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (f2), OEP_ONLY_CONST))
-    return false;
-
-  if (!types_compatible_p (TREE_TYPE (f1), TREE_TYPE (f2)))
-    return false;
-
-  return true;
-}
-
-/* Locate within RECORD a field that is compatible with ORIG_FIELD.  */
-
-tree
-find_compatible_field (tree record, tree orig_field)
-{
-  tree f;
-
-  for (f = TYPE_FIELDS (record); f ; f = TREE_CHAIN (f))
-    if (TREE_CODE (f) == FIELD_DECL
-       && fields_compatible_p (f, orig_field))
-      return f;
-
-  /* ??? Why isn't this on the main fields list?  */
-  f = TYPE_VFIELD (record);
-  if (f && TREE_CODE (f) == FIELD_DECL
-      && fields_compatible_p (f, orig_field))
-    return f;
-
-  /* ??? We should abort here, but Java appears to do Bad Things
-     with inherited fields.  */
-  return orig_field;
-}
-
 /* Return value of a constant X and sign-extend it.  */
 
 HOST_WIDE_INT