(no commit message)

[libreriscv.git] / simple_v_extension.mdwn

diff --git a/simple_v_extension.mdwn b/simple_v_extension.mdwn
index 71c3f9190f972639ee6882fcb1e73a5ca7f15735..afa1bd1acbdea400b1b8548e35dd819ff8fef407 100644 (file)
--- a/simple_v_extension.mdwn
+++ b/simple_v_extension.mdwn
@@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ So the question boils down to:
 Whilst the above may seem to be severe minuses, there are some strong
 pluses:
 
-* Significant reduction of V's opcode space: over 85%.
+* Significant reduction of V's opcode space: over 95%.
 * Smaller reduction of P's opcode space: around 10%.
 * The potential to use Compressed instructions in both Vector and SIMD
   due to the overloading of register meaning (implicit vectorisation,
@@ -1637,7 +1637,7 @@ discussion then led to the question of OoO architectures
 > structure, as the microarchitectural guts have to be spilled to memory.)
 
 
-## Implementation Paradigms
+## Implementation Paradigms <a name="implementation_paradigms"></a>
 
 TODO: assess various implementation paradigms.  These are listed roughly
 in order of simplicity (minimum compliance, for ultra-light-weight