forgot tid

[gem5.git] / src / cpu / pc_event.cc

diff --git a/src/cpu/pc_event.cc b/src/cpu/pc_event.cc
index ad94a8457f9f8b5aec80ecce665366b7077e5667..fca357fe316355bc5d83333812a5e20fb22d5026 100644 (file)
--- a/src/cpu/pc_event.cc
+++ b/src/cpu/pc_event.cc
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 #include "base/trace.hh"
 #include "config/full_system.hh"
 #include "cpu/base.hh"
-#include "cpu/exec_context.hh"
+#include "cpu/thread_context.hh"
 #include "cpu/pc_event.hh"
 #include "sim/debug.hh"
 #include "sim/root.hh"
@@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ PCEventQueue::schedule(PCEvent *event)
 }
 
 bool
-PCEventQueue::doService(ExecContext *xc)
+PCEventQueue::doService(ThreadContext *tc)
 {
-    Addr pc = xc->readPC() & ~0x3;
+    Addr pc = tc->readPC() & ~0x3;
     int serviced = 0;
     range_t range = equal_range(pc);
     for (iterator i = range.first; i != range.second; ++i) {
@@ -91,13 +91,13 @@ PCEventQueue::doService(ExecContext *xc)
         // another event.  This for example, prevents two invocations
         // of the SkipFuncEvent.  Maybe we should have separate PC
         // event queues for each processor?
-        if (pc != (xc->readPC() & ~0x3))
+        if (pc != (tc->readPC() & ~0x3))
             continue;
 
         DPRINTF(PCEvent, "PC based event serviced at %#x: %s\n",
                 (*i)->pc(), (*i)->descr());
 
-        (*i)->process(xc);
+        (*i)->process(tc);
         ++serviced;
     }
 
@@ -128,9 +128,9 @@ BreakPCEvent::BreakPCEvent(PCEventQueue *q, const std::string &desc, Addr addr,
 }
 
 void
-BreakPCEvent::process(ExecContext *xc)
+BreakPCEvent::process(ThreadContext *tc)
 {
-    StringWrap name(xc->getCpuPtr()->name() + ".break_event");
+    StringWrap name(tc->getCpuPtr()->name() + ".break_event");
     DPRINTFN("break event %s triggered\n", descr());
     debug_break();
     if (remove)