gdb: make all_inferiors_safe actually work
The test gdb.threads/fork-plus-threads.exp fails since
08bdefb58b78
("gdb: make inferior_list use intrusive_list"):
FAIL: gdb.threads/fork-plus-threads.exp: detach-on-fork=off: only inferior 1 left
Looking at the log, we see that we are left with a bunch of inferiors in
the detach-on-fork=off case:
info inferiors^M
Num Description Connection Executable ^M
* 1 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M
2 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M
3 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M
4 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M
5 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M
6 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M
7 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M
8 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M
9 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M
10 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M
11 <null> <snip>/fork-plus-threads ^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/fork-plus-threads.exp: detach-on-fork=off: only inferior 1 left
when we expect to have just one. The problem is prune_inferiors not
pruning inferiors. And this is caused by all_inferiors_safe not
actually iterating on inferiors. The current implementation:
inline all_inferiors_safe_range
all_inferiors_safe ()
{
return {};
}
default-constructs an all_inferiors_safe_range, which default-constructs
an all_inferiors_safe_iterator as its m_begin field, which
default-constructs a all_inferiors_iterator. A default-constructed
all_inferiors_iterator is an end iterator, which means we have
constructed an (end,end) all_inferiors_safe_range.
We actually need to pass down the list on which we want to iterator
(that is the inferior_list global), so that all_inferiors_iterator's
first constructor is chosen. We also pass nullptr as the proc_target
filter. In this case, we don't do any filtering, but if in the future
all_inferiors_safe needed to allow filtering on process target (like
all_inferiors does), we could pass down a process target pointer.
basic_safe_iterator's constructor needs to be changed to allow
constructing the wrapped iterator with multiple arguments, not just one.
With this, gdb.threads/fork-plus-threads.exp is passing once again for
me.
Change-Id: I650552ede596e3590c4b7606ce403690a0278a01