nir/flrp: Lower flrp(#a, #b, c) differently

nir/flrp: Lower flrp(#a, #b, c) differently

If the magnitudes of #a and #b are such that (b-a) won't lose too much
precision, lower as a+c(b-a).

No changes on any other Intel platforms.

v2: Rebase on 424372e5dd5 ("nir: Use the flrp lowering pass instead of
nir_opt_algebraic")

Iron Lake and GM45 had similar results. (Iron Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 8192503 -> 8192383 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 18417 -> 18297 (-0.65%)
helped: 68
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 18 x̄: 1.76 x̃: 1
helped stats (rel) min: 0.19% max: 7.89% x̄: 1.10% x̃: 0.43%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -2.48 -1.05
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -1.56% -0.63%
Instructions are helped.

total cycles in shared programs: 188662536 -> 188661956 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 744476 -> 743896 (-0.08%)
helped: 62
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 4 max: 60 x̄: 9.35 x̃: 6
helped stats (rel) min: 0.02% max: 4.84% x̄: 0.27% x̃: 0.06%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -12.37 -6.34
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -0.48% -0.06%
Cycles are helped.

Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>