Provide access to non SEC_HAS_CONTENTS core file sections
Consider the following program:
- - - mkmmapcore.c - - -
static char *buf;
int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
buf = mmap (NULL, 8192, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
abort ();
}
- - - end mkmmapcore.c - - -
Compile it like this:
gcc -g -o mkmmapcore mkmmapcore.c
Now let's run it from GDB. I've already placed a breakpoint on the
line with the abort() call and have run to that breakpoint.
Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffd678) at mkmmapcore.c:11
11 abort ();
(gdb) x/x buf
0x7ffff7fcb000: 0x00000000
Note that we can examine the memory allocated via the call to mmap().
Now let's try debugging a core file created by running this program.
Depending on your system, in order to make a core file, you may have to
run the following as root (or using sudo):
echo core > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
It may also be necessary to do:
ulimit -c unlimited
I'm using Fedora 31. YMMV if you're using one of the BSDs or some other
(non-Linux) system.
This is what things look like when we debug the core file:
[kev@f31-1 tmp]$ gdb -q ./mkmmapcore core.304767
Reading symbols from ./mkmmapcore...
[New LWP 304767]
Core was generated by `/tmp/mkmmapcore'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
50 return ret;
(gdb) x/x buf
0x7ffff7fcb000: Cannot access memory at address 0x7ffff7fcb000
Note that we can no longer access the memory region allocated by mmap().
Back in 2007, a hack for GDB was added to _bfd_elf_make_section_from_phdr()
in bfd/elf.c:
/* Hack for gdb. Segments that have not been modified do
not have their contents written to a core file, on the
assumption that a debugger can find the contents in the
executable. We flag this case by setting the fake
section size to zero. Note that "real" bss sections will
always have their contents dumped to the core file. */
if (bfd_get_format (abfd) == bfd_core)
newsect->size = 0;
You can find the entire patch plus links to other discussion starting
here:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-08/msg00047.html
This hack sets the size of certain BFD sections to 0, which
effectively causes GDB to ignore them. I think it's likely that the
bug described above existed even before this hack was added, but I
have no easy way to test this now.
The output from objdump -h shows the result of this hack:
25 load13
00000000 00007ffff7fcb000 0000000000000000 00013000 2**12
ALLOC
(The first field, after load13, shows the size of 0.)
Once the hack is removed, the output from objdump -h shows the correct
size:
25 load13
00002000 00007ffff7fcb000 0000000000000000 00013000 2**12
ALLOC
(This is a digression, but I think it's good that objdump will now show
the correct size.)
If we remove the hack from bfd/elf.c, but do nothing to GDB, we'll
see the following regression:
FAIL: gdb.base/corefile.exp: print coremaker_ro
The reason for this is that all sections which have the BFD flag
SEC_ALLOC set, but for which SEC_HAS_CONTENTS is not set no longer
have zero size. Some of these sections have data that can (and should)
be read from the executable. (Sections for which SEC_HAS_CONTENTS
is set should be read from the core file; sections which do not have
this flag set need to either be read from the executable or, failing
that, from the core file using whatever BFD decides is the best value
to present to the user - it uses zeros.)
At present, due to the way that the target strata are traversed when
attempting to access memory, the non-SEC_HAS_CONTENTS sections will be
read as zeroes from the process_stratum (which in this case is the
core file stratum) without first checking the file stratum, which is
where the data might actually be found.
What we should be doing is this:
- Attempt to access core file data for SEC_HAS_CONTENTS sections.
- Attempt to access executable file data if the above fails.
- Attempt to access core file data for non SEC_HAS_CONTENTS sections, if
both of the above fail.
This corresponds to the analysis of Daniel Jacobowitz back in 2007
when the hack was added to BFD:
https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2007-08/msg00045.html
The difference, observed by Pedro in his review of my v1 patches, is
that I'm using "the section flags as proxy for the p_filesz/p_memsz
checks."
gdb/ChangeLog:
PR corefiles/25631
* corelow.c (core_target:xfer_partial): Revise
TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY case to consider non-SEC_HAS_CONTENTS
case after first checking the stratum beneath the core
target.
(has_all_memory): Return true.
* target.c (raw_memory_xfer_partial): Revise comment
regarding use of has_all_memory.