inorder:regress: host-inst-rate improved ~58%
authorKorey Sewell <ksewell@umich.edu>
Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:14:52 +0000 (10:14 -0500)
committerKorey Sewell <ksewell@umich.edu>
Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:14:52 +0000 (10:14 -0500)
commit2971b8401a4a76a774962900d9aed6e9eb4b2950
tree7d340ad8093c6dc68395cf209baa0785348137e5
parent470aa289da4ca2d6564db76b30355a527c65347d
inorder:regress: host-inst-rate improved ~58%
there are still only a few inorder benchmark but for the lengthier benchmarks (twolf and vortext)
the latest changes to how instruction scheduling (how instructions figure out what they want to
do on each pipeline stage in the inorder model) were able to improve performance by a nice
amount... The latest results for the inorder model process about 100k insts/second
(note: 58% is over the last time run on 64-bit pool machines at UM)
tests/long/50.vortex/ref/alpha/tru64/inorder-timing/stats.txt
tests/long/70.twolf/ref/alpha/tru64/inorder-timing/stats.txt
tests/quick/00.hello/ref/alpha/linux/inorder-timing/stats.txt
tests/quick/00.hello/ref/mips/linux/inorder-timing/stats.txt