scons,fastmodel: Change how ARM license slots are throttled.

scons,fastmodel: Change how ARM license slots are throttled.

To limit the number of license slots used by SCons when building fast
model components, the fastmodel SConscript set up a group of nodes
which are attached to each simgen run using the SCons SideEffect
method using one of the library files it generates.

To create each unique node, the SCons Value() method was used, passing
it the counter for the loop. In at least version 4 of SCons, what this
ended up doing was setting that library file as a source for each of
the Value() nodes it corresponds to.

That doesn't *seem* like a problem, but then when creating config
include files, files which expose SCons configuration values to C++,
they also create Value() nodes using the value of the config variable.
In cases where that variable is boolean, the value might be 0 or 1.

The result was that the config header depended on Value(0) (for
instance), and then Value(0) depended on a collection of static library
files.

When scons tried to determine whether the config file was up to date,
it tried to check if if its sources had changed. It would check
Value(0), and then Value(0) would try to compute a checksum for its own
source. To do that, it seems to assume that the value can be
interpreted as a string and tries to decode it as utf8. Since the
library is a binary file, that would fail and break the build with a
cryptic message from within the guts of SCons.

To address this, this change replaces the loop index with a call to
object(). Each instance created in that way will be different from
every other, and there will be no way (purposefully or otherwise) to
create a collision with it when creating Value() nodes for some other
purpose.

Change-Id: I56bc842ae66b8cb36d3dcbc25796b708254d6982
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/38617
Reviewed-by: Yu-hsin Wang <yuhsingw@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ahbong Chang <cwahbong@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>