Fix extended function decomposition (#2960)
Fixes #2958.
The issue was: we had substr(x,0,2) in R, and the "derivable substitution" modifed this to substr(substr(x,0,2),0,2) in R, since substr(x,0,2) was the representative of x (which is a bad choice, but regardless is legal). Then decomposition inference asked "can i reduce substr(substr(x,0,2),0,2) in R"? It determines substr(substr(x,0,2),0,2) in R rewrites to substr(x,0,2) in R, which is already true. However, substr(x,0,2) in R was what we started with.
The fix makes things much more conservative: we never mark extended functions reduced based on decomposition, since there isnt a strong argument based on an ordering.