Prefer open-coding vector integer division

Prefer open-coding vector integer division

vect_recog_divmod_pattern currently bails out if the target has
native support for integer division, but I think in practice
it's always going to be better to open-code it anyway, just as
we usually open-code scalar divisions by constants.

I think the only currently affected targets are MIPS MSA and
powerpcspe (which is currently marked obsolete).  For:

  void
  foo (int *x)
  {
    for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
      x[i] /= 2;
  }

the MSA port previously preferred to use division for powers of 2:

        .set    noreorder
        bnz.w   $w1,1f
        div_s.w $w0,$w0,$w1
        break   7
        .set    reorder
1:

(or just the div_s.w for -mno-check-zero-division), but after the patch
it open-codes them using shifts:

        clt_s.w $w1,$w0,$w2
        subv.w  $w0,$w0,$w1
        srai.w  $w0,$w0,1

MSA doesn't define a high-part pattern, so it still uses a division
instruction for the non-power-of-2 case.

Richard B pointed out that this would disable SLP of division by
different amounts, but I think in practice that's a price worth paying,
since the current cost model can't really tell whether using a general
vector division is better than using open-coded scalar divisions.
The fix would be either to support SLP of mixed open-coded divisions
or to improve the cost model and try SLP again without the patterns.
The patch adds an XFAILed test for this.

2018-05-23  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>

gcc/
	* tree-vect-patterns.c: Include predict.h.
	(vect_recog_divmod_pattern): Restrict check for division support
	to when optimizing for size.

gcc/testsuite/
	* gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-div-1.c: New XFAILed test.

From-SVN: r260711