[Ada] Expr. func. with private formal rejected in nested Ghost package
The compiler prematurely freezes a private type that is the type of a
formal parameter of an expression function declared within a nested,
inactivated Ghost package, resulting is an error complaining that the
private type must be fully defined at that point. This is fixed by
testing for Ignored_Ghost_Entity in the condition guarding the code that
performs Mask_Unfrozen_Types for an expression function without a
separate declaration, ensuring that the expression function's profile
isn't frozen prematurely.
2019-07-04 Gary Dismukes <dismukes@adacore.com>
gcc/ada/
* sem_ch6.adb (Analyze_Subprogram_Body_Helper): The special
treatment of calling Mask_Unfrozen_Types must also be done in
the case of an Ignored_Ghost_Entity, because Expander_Active is
False in that case.
gcc/testsuite/
* gnat.dg/ghost5.adb, gnat.dg/ghost5.ads,
gnat.dg/ghost5_parent.ads: New testcase.
From-SVN: r273065