Fix off by one error in strings flat form explanation (#3273)

 Fix off by one error in strings flat form explanation (#3273)

Fixes #3272.

This was caused by not explaining the last equal component in a flat form inference.  For example, if `x=y`, we may infer `z=""` from `u++x++z=u++y` since the 1st and 2nd components of these strings are equal. However, we would not add the explanation of `x=y` due to an off-by-one error.

Notice that this code is very rarely used (the code for F_EndpointEmp is not covered by our regressions). This is since length elaboration should catch conflicting cases like above, where `len(u++x++z)!=len(u++y)` if `x=y` and `z!=""` and thus `u++x++z != u++y`.  #3272 happened to catch a rare case where it is applied. This is likely due to theory combination not propagating an equality prior to running a full effort call to strings check, which is unexpected but not impossible.