[gdb/symtab] Handle DW_AT_decl_file with form DW_FORM_implicit_const
With test-case gdb.cp/temargs.exp on target board \
unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gdwarf-5 I run into:
...
(gdb) info addr I^M
ERROR: GDB process no longer exists
GDB process exited with wait status 32286 exp19 0 0 CHILDKILLED SIGABRT SIGABRT
UNRESOLVED: gdb.cp/temargs.exp: test address of I in templ_m
...
This is a regression since commit
529908cbd0a "Remove DW_UNSND".
The problem is that this DW_AT_decl_file:
...
<1><221>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_structure_type)
<222> DW_AT_name : Base<double, 23, (& a_global), &S::f>
<226> DW_AT_byte_size : 1
<226> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<226> DW_AT_decl_line : 30
<227> DW_AT_sibling : <0x299>
...
is not read by this code in new_symbol:
....
attr = dwarf2_attr (die,
inlined_func ? DW_AT_call_file : DW_AT_decl_file,
cu);
if (attr != nullptr && attr->form_is_unsigned ())
...
because DW_AT_decl_file has form DW_FORM_implicit_const:
...
4 DW_TAG_structure_type [has children]
DW_AT_name DW_FORM_strp
DW_AT_byte_size DW_FORM_implicit_const: 1
DW_AT_decl_file DW_FORM_implicit_const: 1
DW_AT_decl_line DW_FORM_data1
DW_AT_sibling DW_FORM_ref4
DW_AT value: 0 DW_FORM value: 0
...
which is a signed LEB128, so attr->form_is_unsigned () returns false.
Fix this by introducing new functions is_nonnegative and as_nonnegative, and
use these instead of form_is_unsigned and as_unsigned.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2021-02-24 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR symtab/27336
* dwarf2/attribute.c (attribute::form_is_signed): New function
factored out of ...
* dwarf2/attribute.h (attribute::as_signed): ... here.
(attribute::is_nonnegative, attribute::as_nonnegative): New function.
(attribute::form_is_signed): Declare.
* dwarf2/read.c (new_symbol): Use is_nonnegative and as_nonnegative
for DW_AT_decl_file.