gdb: handle endbr64 instruction in amd64_analyze_prologue

gdb: handle endbr64 instruction in amd64_analyze_prologue

v2:
  - test: build full executable instead of object
  - test: add and use supports_fcf_protection
  - test: use gdb_test_multiple's -wrap option
  - test: don't execute gdb_assert if failed to get breakpoint address

Some GCCs now enable -fcf-protection by default.  This is the case, for
example, with GCC 9.3.0 on Ubuntu 20.04.  Enabling it causes the
`endbr64` instruction to be inserted at the beginning of all functions
and that breaks GDB's prologue analysis.

I noticed this because it gives many failures in gdb.base/break.exp.
But let's take this dummy program and put a breakpoint on main:

    int main(void)
    {
        return 0;
    }

Without -fcf-protection, the breakpoint is correctly put after the prologue:

    $ gcc test.c -g3 -O0 -fcf-protection=none
    $ ./gdb -q -nx --data-directory=data-directory a.out
    Reading symbols from a.out...
    (gdb) disassemble main
    Dump of assembler code for function main:
       0x0000000000001129 <+0>:     push   %rbp
       0x000000000000112a <+1>:     mov    %rsp,%rbp
       0x000000000000112d <+4>:     mov    $0x0,%eax
       0x0000000000001132 <+9>:     pop    %rbp
       0x0000000000001133 <+10>:    retq
    End of assembler dump.
    (gdb) b main
    Breakpoint 1 at 0x112d: file test.c, line 3.

With -fcf-protection, the breakpoint is incorrectly put on the first
byte of the function:

    $ gcc test.c -g3 -O0 -fcf-protection=full
    $ ./gdb -q -nx --data-directory=data-directory a.out
    Reading symbols from a.out...
    (gdb) disassemble main
    Dump of assembler code for function main:
       0x0000000000001129 <+0>:     endbr64
       0x000000000000112d <+4>:     push   %rbp
       0x000000000000112e <+5>:     mov    %rsp,%rbp
       0x0000000000001131 <+8>:     mov    $0x0,%eax
       0x0000000000001136 <+13>:    pop    %rbp
       0x0000000000001137 <+14>:    retq
    End of assembler dump.
    (gdb) b main
    Breakpoint 1 at 0x1129: file test.c, line 2.

Stepping in amd64_skip_prologue, we can see that the prologue analysis,
for GCC-compiled programs, is done in amd64_analyze_prologue by decoding
the instructions and looking for typical patterns.  This patch changes
the analysis to check for a prologue starting with the `endbr64`
instruction, and skip it if it's there.

gdb/ChangeLog:

	* amd64-tdep.c (amd64_analyze_prologue): Check for `endbr64`
	instruction, skip it if it's there.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gdb.arch/amd64-prologue-skip-cf-protection.exp: New file.
	* gdb.arch/amd64-prologue-skip-cf-protection.c: New file.