gdb, btrace: switch threads in remote_btrace_maybe_reopen()
In remote_btrace_maybe_reopen() we iterate over threads and use
set_general_thread() to set the thread from which to transfer the btrace
configuration.
This sets the remote general thread but does not affect inferior_ptid. On
the xfer request later on, remote_target::xfer_partial() again sets the
remote general thread to inferior_ptid, overwriting what
remote_btrace_maybe_reopen() had done.
In one case, this led to inferior_ptid being null_ptid when we tried to
enable tracing on a newly created thread inside a newly created process
during attach.
This, in turn, led to find_inferior_pid() asserting when we iterated over
threads in record_btrace_is_replaying(), which was called from
record_btrace_target::xfer_partial() when reading the btrace configuration
of the new thread to check whether it was already being recorded.
The bug was exposed by
0618ae41497 gdb: optimize all_matching_threads_iterator
and found by
FAIL: gdb.btrace/enable-new-thread.exp: ... (GDB internal error)
Use switch_to_thread() in remote_btrace_maybe_reopen().