+/* Some header appear to define uint already, so apply some
+ uglification. Note that without uglification, the compile
+ does not fail, rather, we don't test what we want because
+ something else calls check_typedef on 'uint' already. */
+typedef unsigned int uint_for_mi_testing;
+
+struct Data {
+ int alloc;
+ uint_for_mi_testing sharable : 4;
+};
+
+/* Accessing a value of a bitfield whose type is a typed used to
+ result in division by zero. See:
+
+ http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10884
+
+ This tests for this bug. */
+
+void do_bitfield_tests ()
+{
+ /*: BEGIN: bitfield :*/
+ struct Data d = {0, 3};
+ /*:
+ mi_create_varobj V d "create varobj for Data"
+ mi_list_varobj_children "V" {
+ {"V.alloc" "alloc" "0" "int"}
+ {"V.sharable" "sharable" "0" "unsigned int"}
+ } "list children of Data"
+ mi_check_varobj_value V.sharable 3 "access bitfield"
+ :*/
+ return;
+ /*: END: bitfield :*/
+}
+