+2018-01-03 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
+ Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>
+ David Sherwood <david.sherwood@arm.com>
+
+ * lra-constraints.c (process_alt_operands): Reject matched
+ operands whose sizes aren't ordered.
+ (match_reload): Refer to this check here.
+
2018-01-03 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>
David Sherwood <david.sherwood@arm.com>
push_to_sequence (*before);
if (inmode != outmode)
{
+ /* process_alt_operands has already checked that the mode sizes
+ are ordered. */
if (partial_subreg_p (outmode, inmode))
{
reg = new_in_reg
len = 0;
lra_assert (nop > m);
+ /* Reject matches if we don't know which operand is
+ bigger. This situation would arguably be a bug in
+ an .md pattern, but could also occur in a user asm. */
+ if (!ordered_p (GET_MODE_SIZE (biggest_mode[m]),
+ GET_MODE_SIZE (biggest_mode[nop])))
+ break;
+
this_alternative_matches = m;
m_hregno = get_hard_regno (*curr_id->operand_loc[m], false);
/* We are supposed to match a previous operand.