--m32rx support the extended m32rx instruction set\n");
fprintf (stream, "\
---warn-explicit-parallel-conflicts Warn when parallel instrucitons violate contraints\
+--warn-explicit-parallel-conflicts Warn when parallel instrucitons violate contraints\n");
+ fprintf (stream, "\
--no-warn-explicit-parallel-conflicts Do not warn when parallel instrucitons violate contraints\n");
/* end-sanitize-m32rx */
unsigned char syntax_field;
CGEN_FIELDS * fields;
{
- switch (syntax_field)
- {
- case 128 + M32R_OPERAND_SR: return fields->f_r2;
- /* Relies upon the fact that no instruction with a $src1 operand
- also has a $dr operand. */
- case 128 + M32R_OPERAND_SRC1: return fields->f_r1;
- case 128 + M32R_OPERAND_SRC2: return fields->f_r2;
- default: abort(); return -1;
- }
+ /* Relies upon the fact that no instruction with a $src1 operand
+ also has a $dr operand. */
+ return m32r_cgen_get_operand (CGEN_SYNTAX_FIELD (syntax_field), fields);
}
/* Returns zero iff the output register of instruction 'a'
check_parallel_io_clash (a, b)
m32r_insn * a;
m32r_insn * b;
-{
+{
+#if 0 /* FIXME: to be revisited. */
+ {
+ const CGEN_INSN *insn;
+ int a_indices[MAX_OPERAND_INSTANCES];
+
+ /* FIXME: CGEN_FIELDS is already recorded, but relying on that fact
+ doesn't seem right. Perhaps allow passing fields like we do insn. */
+ insn = m32r_cgen_get_insn_operands (a->insn,
+ bfd_getb16 ((char *) a->buffer), 16,
+ a_indices);
+ if (! insn)
+ as_fatal ("internal error: m32r_cgen_get_insn_operands");
+ }
+#endif
+
if (writes_to_dest_reg (a->insn))
{
unsigned char syntax_field;
two instructions be executed in parallel). Although if the global
variable warn_explicit_parallel_conflicts is true then we do generate
a warning message. Similarly we assume that parallel branch and jump
- instructions are deliberate and should not produce errors. */
+ instructions are deliberate and should not produce errors. */
- if ((errmsg = (char *) can_make_parallel (& first, & second)) == NULL)
+ if (warn_explicit_parallel_conflicts)
{
- if (warn_explicit_parallel_conflicts
- && (! check_parallel_io_clash (& first, & second)))
+ if (! check_parallel_io_clash (& first, & second))
as_warn ("%s: output of first instruction is the same as the input of second instruction - is this intentional ?", str2);
+ if (! check_parallel_io_clash (& second, & first))
+ as_warn ("%s: output of second instruction is the same as the input of first instruction - is this intentional ?", str2);
+ }
+
+ if ((errmsg = (char *) can_make_parallel (& first, & second)) == NULL)
+ {
/* Get the fixups for the first instruction. */
cgen_swap_fixups ();
/* Try swapping the instructions to see if they work that way. */
else if (can_make_parallel (& second, & first, false, false) == NULL)
{
- if (warn_explicit_parallel_conflicts
- && (! check_parallel_io_clash (& second, & first)))
- as_warn ("%s: had to swap instructions to make them parallel, but the output of the second instruction is the same as the input of first instruction - is this intentional ?", str2);
-
/* Write out the second instruction first. */
(void) cgen_asm_finish_insn (second.insn, second.buffer,
CGEN_FIELDS_BITSIZE (& second.fields));