COSTS_N_INSNS (1), /* cost of movzx. */
8, /* "large" insn. */
9, /* MOVE_RATIO. */
- 4, /* cost for loading QImode using
+
+ /* reg-reg moves are done by renaming and thus they are even cheaper than
+ 1 cycle. Becuase reg-reg move cost is 2 and the following tables correspond
+ to doubles of latencies, we do not model this correctly. It does not
+ seem to make practical difference to bump prices up even more. */
+ 6, /* cost for loading QImode using
movzbl. */
- {5, 5, 4}, /* cost of loading integer registers
+ {6, 6, 6}, /* cost of loading integer registers
in QImode, HImode and SImode.
Relative to reg-reg move (2). */
- {4, 4, 4}, /* cost of storing integer
+ {8, 8, 8}, /* cost of storing integer
registers. */
2, /* cost of reg,reg fld/fst. */
- {5, 5, 12}, /* cost of loading fp registers
+ {6, 6, 16}, /* cost of loading fp registers
in SFmode, DFmode and XFmode. */
- {4, 4, 8}, /* cost of storing fp registers
+ {8, 8, 16}, /* cost of storing fp registers
in SFmode, DFmode and XFmode. */
2, /* cost of moving MMX register. */
- {4, 4}, /* cost of loading MMX registers
+ {6, 6}, /* cost of loading MMX registers
in SImode and DImode. */
- {4, 4}, /* cost of storing MMX registers
+ {8, 8}, /* cost of storing MMX registers
in SImode and DImode. */
2, /* cost of moving SSE register. */
- {4, 4, 4}, /* cost of loading SSE registers
+ {6, 6, 6}, /* cost of loading SSE registers
in SImode, DImode and TImode. */
- {4, 4, 4}, /* cost of storing SSE registers
+ {8, 8, 8}, /* cost of storing SSE registers
in SImode, DImode and TImode. */
- 2, /* MMX or SSE register to integer. */
+ 6, /* MMX or SSE register to integer. */
32, /* size of l1 cache. */
512, /* size of l2 cache. */
64, /* size of prefetch block. */