+2007-02-23 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@codesourcery.com>
+
+ * dwarf2.c (_bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line): Assume 32-bit
+ DWARF even with 64-bit addresses.
+ (_bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line): Likewise.
+
2007-02-23 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
PR binutils/3535
length = read_4_bytes (abfd, stash->info_ptr + 4);
stash->info_ptr += 8;
}
- /* In the absence of the hints above, we assume addr_size-sized
- offsets, for backward-compatibility with pre-DWARF3 64-bit
- platforms. */
+ /* In the absence of the hints above, we assume 32-bit DWARF2
+ offsets even for targets with 64-bit addresses, because:
+ a) most of the time these targets will not have generated
+ more than 2Gb of debug info and so will not need 64-bit
+ offsets,
+ and
+ b) if they do use 64-bit offsets but they are not using
+ the size hints that are tested for above then they are
+ not conforming to the DWARF3 standard anyway. */
else if (addr_size == 8)
{
- length = read_8_bytes (abfd, stash->info_ptr);
- stash->info_ptr += 8;
+ offset_size = 4;
+ stash->info_ptr += 4;
}
else
stash->info_ptr += 4;
length = read_4_bytes (abfd, stash->info_ptr + 4);
stash->info_ptr += 8;
}
- /* In the absence of the hints above, we assume addr_size-sized
- offsets, for backward-compatibility with pre-DWARF3 64-bit
- platforms. */
+ /* In the absence of the hints above, we assume 32-bit DWARF2
+ offsets even for targets with 64-bit addresses, because:
+ a) most of the time these targets will not have generated
+ more than 2Gb of debug info and so will not need 64-bit
+ offsets,
+ and
+ b) if they do use 64-bit offsets but they are not using
+ the size hints that are tested for above then they are
+ not conforming to the DWARF3 standard anyway. */
else if (addr_size == 8)
{
- length = read_8_bytes (abfd, stash->info_ptr);
- stash->info_ptr += 8;
+ offset_size = 4;
+ stash->info_ptr += 4;
}
else
stash->info_ptr += 4;