+2018-12-04 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
+
+ PR rtl-optimization/88317
+ * lra-constraints.c (split_reg): Don't set up check_only_regs if
+ we are outside the inheritance pass.
+
2018-12-04 Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
* ipa-prop.c (jump_function_useful_p): New.
ORIGINAL_REGNO. NEXT_USAGE_INSNS specifies which instruction in
the EBB next uses ORIGINAL_REGNO; it has the same form as the
"insns" field of usage_insns. If TO is not NULL, we don't use
- usage_insns, we put restore insns after TO insn.
+ usage_insns, we put restore insns after TO insn. It is a case when
+ we call it from lra_split_hard_reg_for, outside the inheritance
+ pass.
The transformations look like:
&& mode == PSEUDO_REGNO_MODE (original_regno))
lra_copy_reg_equiv (new_regno, original_regno);
lra_reg_info[new_regno].restore_rtx = regno_reg_rtx[original_regno];
- bitmap_set_bit (&check_only_regs, new_regno);
- bitmap_set_bit (&check_only_regs, original_regno);
bitmap_set_bit (&lra_split_regs, new_regno);
if (to != NULL)
{
+ lra_assert (next_usage_insns == NULL);
usage_insn = to;
after_p = TRUE;
}
else
{
+ /* We need check_only_regs only inside the inheritance pass. */
+ bitmap_set_bit (&check_only_regs, new_regno);
+ bitmap_set_bit (&check_only_regs, original_regno);
after_p = usage_insns[original_regno].after_p;
for (;;)
{