+2003-07-15 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
+
+ * frame.c (get_prev_frame): Move disabled inside_entry_func to
+ before code inhibiting repeated unwind attempts. Add to
+ commentary on that test's problems.
+ * blockframe.c (inside_main_func): Look for "main" in the minimal
+ symbol table.
+ * d10v-tdep.c (d10v_frame_this_id): Delete check that frames are
+ identical.
+
2003-07-15 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* complaints.c (struct explanation): Define.
BLOCK_END (SYMBOL_BLOCK_VALUE (mainsym));
}
}
+
+ /* Not in the normal symbol tables, see if "main" is in the partial
+ symbol table. If it's not, then give up. */
+ {
+ struct minimal_symbol *msymbol
+ = lookup_minimal_symbol (main_name (), NULL, symfile_objfile);
+ if (msymbol != NULL && MSYMBOL_TYPE (msymbol) == mst_text)
+ {
+ struct obj_section *osect
+ = find_pc_sect_section (SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol),
+ msymbol->ginfo.bfd_section);
+ if (osect != NULL)
+ {
+ int i;
+ /* Step over other symbols at this same address, and
+ symbols in other sections, to find the next symbol in
+ this section with a different address. */
+ for (i = 1; SYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (msymbol + i) != NULL; i++)
+ {
+ if (SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol + i) != SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol)
+ && SYMBOL_BFD_SECTION (msymbol + i) == SYMBOL_BFD_SECTION (msymbol))
+ break;
+ }
+
+ symfile_objfile->ei.main_func_lowpc = SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol);
+
+ /* Use the lesser of the next minimal symbol in the same
+ section, or the end of the section, as the end of the
+ function. */
+ if (SYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (msymbol + i) != NULL
+ && SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol + i) < osect->endaddr)
+ symfile_objfile->ei.main_func_highpc = SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol + i);
+ else
+ /* We got the start address from the last msymbol in the
+ objfile. So the end address is the end of the
+ section. */
+ symfile_objfile->ei.main_func_highpc = osect->endaddr;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
return (symfile_objfile->ei.main_func_lowpc <= pc &&
symfile_objfile->ei.main_func_highpc > pc);
}
id = frame_id_build (base, func);
- /* Check that we're not going round in circles with the same frame
- ID (but avoid applying the test to sentinel frames which do go
- round in circles). Can't use frame_id_eq() as that doesn't yet
- compare the frame's PC value. */
- if (frame_relative_level (next_frame) >= 0
- && get_frame_type (next_frame) != DUMMY_FRAME
- && frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (next_frame), id))
- return;
-
(*this_id) = id;
}
return NULL;
}
+ /* If we're already inside the entry function for the main objfile,
+ then it isn't valid. Don't apply this test to a dummy frame -
+ dummy frame PC's typically land in the entry func. Don't apply
+ this test to the sentinel frame. Sentinel frames should always
+ be allowed to unwind. */
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-02-25: Don't enable until someone has found
+ hard evidence that this is needed. */
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-07-07: Fixed a bug in inside_main_func - wasn't
+ checking for "main" in the minimal symbols. With that fixed
+ asm-source tests now stop in "main" instead of halting the
+ backtrace in wierd and wonderful ways somewhere inside the entry
+ file. Suspect that inside_entry_file and inside_entry_func tests
+ were added to work around that (now fixed) case. */
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-07-15: danielj (if I'm reading it right)
+ suggested having the inside_entry_func test use the
+ inside_main_func msymbol trick (along with entry_point_address I
+ guess) to determine the address range of the start function.
+ That should provide a far better stopper than the current
+ heuristics. */
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-07-15: Need to add a "set backtrace
+ beyond-entry-func" command so that this can be selectively
+ disabled. */
+ if (0
+#if 0
+ && backtrace_beyond_entry_func
+#endif
+ && this_frame->type != DUMMY_FRAME && this_frame->level >= 0
+ && inside_entry_func (get_frame_pc (this_frame)))
+ {
+ if (frame_debug)
+ {
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> ");
+ fprint_frame (gdb_stdlog, NULL);
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "// inside entry func }\n");
+ }
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
/* Only try to do the unwind once. */
if (this_frame->prev_p)
{
}
#endif
- /* If we're already inside the entry function for the main objfile,
- then it isn't valid. Don't apply this test to a dummy frame -
- dummy frame PC's typically land in the entry func. Don't apply
- this test to the sentinel frame. Sentinel frames should always
- be allowed to unwind. */
- /* NOTE: cagney/2003-02-25: Don't enable until someone has found
- hard evidence that this is needed. */
- if (0
- && this_frame->type != DUMMY_FRAME && this_frame->level >= 0
- && inside_entry_func (get_frame_pc (this_frame)))
- {
- if (frame_debug)
- {
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> ");
- fprint_frame (gdb_stdlog, NULL);
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "// inside entry func }\n");
- }
- return NULL;
- }
-
/* If any of the old frame initialization methods are around, use
the legacy get_prev_frame method. */
if (legacy_frame_p (current_gdbarch))
+2003-07-15 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
+
+ * gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: Do not allow "start" in the backtrace.
+
2003-07-15 Michael Chastain <mec@shout.net>
* gdb.base/gdb1250.exp: New file.
# doesn't fall off the stack.
gdb_test "bt 10" \
- "\#0.*foo2.*asmsrc2\[.\]s:12.*\#1.*main.*asmsrc1\[.\]s:33(.*\#2.*start\[^\r\n\]*)?" \
+ "\#0.*foo2.*asmsrc2\[.\]s:12.*\#1.*main.*asmsrc1\[.\]s:33" \
"bt ALL in foo2"
# See if a capped `bt' prints the right source files.
projects / binutils-gdb.git / commitdiff