Commit
0be837be9fb4 ("gdb: make "start" breakpoint inferior-specific")
regresses gdb.ada/start.exp:
(gdb) start
Error in expression, near `1'.
(gdb) UNTESTED: gdb.ada/start.exp: start failed to land inside the right procedure
This is because in Ada, the equality operator is =, not ==.
I checked the other languages supported by GDB, these other languages
use = for equality:
- Pascal: tests like gdb.pascal/hello.exp are affected too
- Modula-2: I tried building a Modula-2 hello world using gm2, but it
seems like the generated DWARF doesn't specify the Modula-2 language
in the CUs, it's C++ and C, so the selected language isn't
"modula-2". But if I manually do "set language modula-2" on a dummy
program and then "start", I get the same error.
Other languages all use ==.
So, a short term fix would be to use = or == in the expression, based on
the current language. If this was meant to be permanent, I would
suggest adding something like an "equality_operator" method to
language_defn, that returns the right equality operator for the
language. But the goal is to replace all this with proper
inferior-specific breakpoints, so I hope all this is temporary.
Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Change-Id: Id4d38e14a80e6bbbb1ad2b2277f974dd55192969
have proper inferior-specific breakpoint support, in the breakpoint
machinery. We could then avoid inserting a breakpoint in the program
spaces unrelated to this inferior. */
- std::string arg = string_printf ("-qualified %s if $_inferior == %d", main_name (),
- current_inferior ()->num);
+ const char *op
+ = ((current_language->la_language == language_ada
+ || current_language->la_language == language_pascal
+ || current_language->la_language == language_m2) ? "=" : "==");
+ std::string arg = string_printf
+ ("-qualified %s if $_inferior %s %d", main_name (), op,
+ current_inferior ()->num);
tbreak_command (arg.c_str (), 0);
}