* gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/basic/fp_comp2.s: New.
+Sat Aug 28 00:16:12 1999 Jerry Quinn <jquinn@nortelnetworks.com>
+
+ * gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/basic/basic.exp (do_fp_comp2): New.
+ * gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/basic/fp_comp2.s: New.
+
1999-08-20 Alan Modra <alan@spri.levels.unisa.edu.au>
* gas/i386/general.s, gas/i386/general.l: Add .code16gcc
if [expr $x==55] then { pass $testname } else { fail $testname }
}
+proc do_fp_comp2 {} {
+ set testname "fp_comp2.s: fp_comp2 tests"
+ set x 0
+
+ gas_start "fp_comp2.s" "-al"
+
+ # Check the assembled instruction against a table built by the HP assembler
+ # Any differences should be checked by hand -- with the number of problems
+ # I've seen in the HP assembler I don't completely trust it.
+ #
+ # Instead of having a variable for each match string just increment the
+ # total number of matches seen. That's simpler when testing large numbers
+ # of instructions (as these tests to).
+ while 1 {
+ expect {
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0000 B8AA638E\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0004 B8AA6A0E\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0008 BA5B2595\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 000c BA5B2C15\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0010 B8AA63AE\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0014 B8AA6A2E\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0018 BA5B25B5\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 001c BA5B2C35\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0020 38A0C04A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0024 30A0C80A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0028 30A0D80A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 002c 3A80C098\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0030 3280C818\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0034 38A0E04A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0038 30A0E80A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 003c 30A0F80A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0040 3A80E098\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0044 3280E818\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
+ -re "\[^\n\]*\n" { }
+ timeout { perror "timeout\n"; break }
+ eof { break }
+ }
+ }
+
+ # This was intended to do any cleanup necessary. It kinda looks like it
+ # isn't needed, but just in case, please keep it in for now.
+ gas_finish
+
+ # Did we find what we were looking for? If not, flunk it.
+ if [expr $x==18] then { pass $testname } else { fail $testname }
+}
+
proc do_fp_conv {} {
set testname "fp_conv.s: fp_conv tests"
set x 0
# Test that we correctly assemble some FP memory tests which
# L/R register selects. (Regression test for a bug Tege found).
do_fmem_LR_tests
+
+ # PA2.0 tests
+ do_fp_comp2
}
--- /dev/null
+ .LEVEL 2.0
+ .SPACE $PRIVATE$
+ .SUBSPA $DATA$,QUAD=1,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=31
+ .SUBSPA $BSS$,QUAD=1,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=31,ZERO,SORT=82
+ .SPACE $TEXT$
+ .SUBSPA $LIT$,QUAD=0,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=44
+ .SUBSPA $CODE$,QUAD=0,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=44,CODE_ONLY
+
+ .SPACE $TEXT$
+ .SUBSPA $CODE$
+
+ .align 4
+; Basic immediate instruction tests.
+;
+; We could/should test some of the corner cases for register and
+; immediate fields. We should also check the assorted field
+; selectors to make sure they're handled correctly.
+ fmpyfadd,sgl %fr5R,%fr10L,%fr13R,%fr14L
+ fmpyfadd,dbl %fr5,%fr10,%fr13,%fr14
+ fmpyfadd,sgl %fr18R,%fr27L,%fr6R,%fr21L
+ fmpyfadd,dbl %fr18,%fr27,%fr6,%fr21
+
+ fmpynfadd,sgl %fr5R,%fr10L,%fr13R,%fr14L
+ fmpynfadd,dbl %fr5,%fr10,%fr13,%fr14
+ fmpynfadd,sgl %fr18R,%fr27L,%fr6R,%fr21L
+ fmpynfadd,dbl %fr18,%fr27,%fr6,%fr21
+
+ fneg,sgl %fr5,%fr10R
+ fneg,dbl %fr5,%fr10
+ fneg,quad %fr5,%fr10
+ fneg,sgl %fr20R,%fr24L
+ fneg,dbl %fr20,%fr24
+
+ fnegabs,sgl %fr5,%fr10R
+ fnegabs,dbl %fr5,%fr10
+ fnegabs,quad %fr5,%fr10
+ fnegabs,sgl %fr20R,%fr24L
+ fnegabs,dbl %fr20,%fr24
+