[^n1]: difficult to ascertain, see [NEON/VFP](https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0018/a/NEON-and-VFP-Instruction-Summary/List-of-all-NEON-and-VFP-instructions).
Critically depends on ARM Scalar instructions
[^e1]: difficult to exactly ascertain, see ARM Architecture Reference Manual Supplement, DDI 0584. Critically depends on ARM Scalar instructions.
-[^e3]: ARM states that the Scalability is a [Silicon-partner choice](https://developer.arm.com/-/media/Arm%20Developer%20Community/PDF/102340_0001_00_en_introduction-to-sve2.pdf?revision=aae96dd2-5334-4ad3-9a47-393086a20fea).
- Scalability in the ISA is **not available to the programmer**: there is no `setvl` instruction in SVE2, which is already causing assembler programmer difficulties.
+[^e3]: ARM states that the Scalability is a [Silicon-partner choice](https://developer.arm.com/-/media/Arm%20Developer%20Community/PDF/102340_0001_00_en_introduction-to-sve2.pdf?revision=aae96dd2-5334-4ad3-9a47-393086a20fea). Scalability in the ISA is **not available to the programmer**: there is no `setvl` instruction in SVE2, which is already causing assembler programmer difficulties.
[quote](https://gist.github.com/zingaburga/805669eb891c820bd220418ee3f0d6bd#file-sve2-md) **"you may be stuck with only using the bottom 128 bits of the vector, or need to code specifically for each width"**
[^x1]: [AVX512 Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVX-512), [Lifecycle of an instruction set](https://media.handmade-seattle.com/tom-forsyth/) including full slides
[^x2]: difficult to exactly ascertain, contains subsets. Critically depends on ISA support from earlier x86 ISA subsets (several more thousand instructions). See [SIMD ISA listing](https://www.officedaytime.com/simd512e/)
[^r1]: [RVV Spec](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec/blob/master/v-spec.adoc)
[^r2]: RISC-V Vectors are not stand-alone, i.e. like SVE2 and AVX-512 are critically dependent on the Scalar ISA (an additional ~96 instructions for the Scalar RV64GC set, needed for Linux).
-[^r4]: Like the original Cray RVV is a truly scalable Vector ISA (Cray
-setvl instruction). However, like SVE2, the Maximum Vector length is a
-[Silicon-partner choice](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec/blob/master/v-spec.adoc#sec-vector-extensions),
-which creates similar limitations that SVP64 does not have.
-The RISC-V Founders strongly discourage efforts by programmers to
-find out the Silicon's Maximum Vector Length, as an effort to steer
-programmers towards Silicon-independent assembler. **This requires all
-algorithms to contain a loop construct**.
-MAXVL in SVP64 is a Spec-hard-fixed quantity therefore loop constructs are
-not necessary 100% of the time.
+[^r4]: Like the original Cray RVV is a truly scalable Vector ISA (Cray setvl instruction). However, like SVE2, the Maximum Vector length is a [Silicon-partner choice](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec/blob/master/v-spec.adoc#sec-vector-extensions), which creates similar limitations that SVP64 does not have. The RISC-V Founders strongly discourage efforts by programmers to
+find out the Silicon's Maximum Vector Length, as an effort to steer programmers towards Silicon-independent assembler. **This requires all algorithms to contain a loop construct**. MAXVL in SVP64 is a Spec-hard-fixed quantity therefore loop constructs are not necessary 100% of the time.
[^r5]: like SVP64 it is up to the hardware implementor (Silicon partner) to choose whether to support 128-bit elements.
[^s1]: [NEC SX Aurora](https://ftp.libre-soc.org/NEC_SX_Aurora_TSUBASA_VectorEngine-as-manual-v1.2.pdf) is based on the original Cray Vectors
[^s2]: [Aurora ISA guide](https://sxauroratsubasa.sakura.ne.jp/documents/guide/pdfs/Aurora_ISA_guide.pdf) Appendix-3 11.1 p508