gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c: xfail scan for mmix.

Looking at the dump and the test, I guess all "64-bit targets" fail
the test for the reasons seen in the comment just above the dg-final,
whose last two lines make it to the patch context.  Maybe the xfail
target list can be shortened by removing most targets and use just
"lp64".  That doesn't cover it passing on x86_64 and s390x-zarch
though.

gcc/testsuite:
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c: xfail scan for mmix.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c
index e4daa9d4ff38304ef9cf8db02a246bbb9bfa1486..a879d3059714a3c077539b7d2cd81f573f788960 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c
@@ -27,4 +27,4 @@ foo ()
    but the loop reads only one element at a time, and DOM cannot resolve these.
    The same happens on powerpc depending on the SIMD support available.  */
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return 28;" "optimized" { xfail { { alpha*-*-* hppa*64*-*-* nvptx*-*-* } || { { { lp64 && { powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* riscv*-*-* } } || aarch64_sve } || { arm*-*-* && { ! arm_neon } } } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return 28;" "optimized" { xfail { { alpha*-*-* hppa*64*-*-* nvptx*-*-* mmix-knuth-mmixware } || { { { lp64 && { powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* riscv*-*-* } } || aarch64_sve } || { arm*-*-* && { ! arm_neon } } } } } } } */