gdb: Remove unneeded parameter from set_breakpoint_location_function
authorAndrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Mon, 1 Jul 2019 15:00:52 +0000 (16:00 +0100)
committerAndrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:31:20 +0000 (10:31 +0100)
The explicit_loc parameter in set_breakpoint_location_function is not
useful.  This parameter is set from two possible fields of the
symtab_and_line used to create the breakpoint; the explicit_pc field,
and the explicit_line field.

First, the explicit_line field, this is not currently set for any
breakpoint command, so will never be true.

Next, the explicit_pc field.  This can be true but will never be true
at the same time that the sal->msymbol field is also true - the
sal->msymbol is only ever set in linespec.c:minsym_found, which
doesn't allow for explicitly setting the pc.

The result of this is that if we are setting a breakpoint on an
msymbol that could turn out to be an ifunc, then we will not also have
either an explicit_pc or an explicit_line, this check can therefore be
removed.

There should be no user visible changes after this commit.

gdb/ChangeLog:

* breakpoint.c (set_breakpoint_location_function): Remove
explicit_loc parameter.
(momentary_breakpoint_from_master): Update call to
set_breakpoint_location_function.
(add_location_to_breakpoint): Likewise.

gdb/ChangeLog
gdb/breakpoint.c

index 854eeb5b0e53eb6539b80ddd29baff244134a035..2fef7d271e3fb3519e9f2e01e9fa025193a0314c 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2019-07-09  Andrew Burgess  <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
+
+       * breakpoint.c (set_breakpoint_location_function): Remove
+       explicit_loc parameter.
+       (momentary_breakpoint_from_master): Update call to
+       set_breakpoint_location_function.
+       (add_location_to_breakpoint): Likewise.
+
 2019-07-09  Andrew Burgess  <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
 
        * riscv-tdep.c (riscv_features_from_gdbarch_info): Don't modify
index b49be762a2fe31348ab6ebc4c77b72d768d756d0..9bae0a0254605b5156240341d331ee3cc0163a4d 100644 (file)
@@ -7095,12 +7095,10 @@ set_raw_breakpoint_without_location (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
   return add_to_breakpoint_chain (std::move (b));
 }
 
-/* Initialize loc->function_name.  EXPLICIT_LOC says no indirect function
-   resolutions should be made as the user specified the location explicitly
-   enough.  */
+/* Initialize loc->function_name.  */
 
 static void
-set_breakpoint_location_function (struct bp_location *loc, int explicit_loc)
+set_breakpoint_location_function (struct bp_location *loc)
 {
   gdb_assert (loc->owner != NULL);
 
@@ -7112,8 +7110,7 @@ set_breakpoint_location_function (struct bp_location *loc, int explicit_loc)
 
       if (loc->msymbol != NULL
          && (MSYMBOL_TYPE (loc->msymbol) == mst_text_gnu_ifunc
-             || MSYMBOL_TYPE (loc->msymbol) == mst_data_gnu_ifunc)
-         && !explicit_loc)
+             || MSYMBOL_TYPE (loc->msymbol) == mst_data_gnu_ifunc))
        {
          struct breakpoint *b = loc->owner;
 
@@ -8481,7 +8478,7 @@ momentary_breakpoint_from_master (struct breakpoint *orig,
 
   copy = set_raw_breakpoint_without_location (orig->gdbarch, type, ops);
   copy->loc = allocate_bp_location (copy);
-  set_breakpoint_location_function (copy->loc, 1);
+  set_breakpoint_location_function (copy->loc);
 
   copy->loc->gdbarch = orig->loc->gdbarch;
   copy->loc->requested_address = orig->loc->requested_address;
@@ -8586,8 +8583,7 @@ add_location_to_breakpoint (struct breakpoint *b,
   loc->msymbol = sal->msymbol;
   loc->objfile = sal->objfile;
 
-  set_breakpoint_location_function (loc,
-                                   sal->explicit_pc || sal->explicit_line);
+  set_breakpoint_location_function (loc);
 
   /* While by definition, permanent breakpoints are already present in the
      code, we don't mark the location as inserted.  Normally one would expect