This makes the CAD solver use the new arith::InferenceManager instead of the previously used lemma collection scheme.
conflict(Rewriter::rewrite(conf));
}
+bool InferenceManager::hasUsed() const
+{
+ return hasSent() || hasPending();
+}
+
std::size_t InferenceManager::numWaitingLemmas() const
{
return d_waitingLem.size();
/** Add a conflict to the this inference manager. */
void addConflict(const Node& conf, InferenceId inftype);
+ /**
+ * Checks whether we have made any progress, that is whether a conflict, lemma
+ * or fact was added or whether a lemma or fact is pending.
+ */
+ bool hasUsed() const;
+
/** Returns the number of pending lemmas. */
std::size_t numWaitingLemmas() const;
namespace arith {
namespace nl {
-CadSolver::CadSolver(TheoryArith& containing, NlModel& model)
- : d_foundSatisfiability(false), d_containing(containing), d_model(model)
+CadSolver::CadSolver(InferenceManager& im, NlModel& model)
+ : d_foundSatisfiability(false), d_im(im), d_model(model)
{
d_ranVariable =
NodeManager::currentNM()->mkSkolem("__z",
#endif
}
-std::vector<NlLemma> CadSolver::checkFull()
+void CadSolver::checkFull()
{
#ifdef CVC4_POLY_IMP
- std::vector<NlLemma> lems;
auto covering = d_CAC.getUnsatCover();
if (covering.empty())
{
d_foundSatisfiability = false;
auto mis = collectConstraints(covering);
Trace("nl-cad") << "Collected MIS: " << mis << std::endl;
- auto* nm = NodeManager::currentNM();
- for (auto& n : mis)
- {
- n = n.negate();
- }
Assert(!mis.empty()) << "Infeasible subset can not be empty";
- if (mis.size() == 1)
- {
- lems.emplace_back(mis.front(), InferenceId::NL_CAD_CONFLICT);
- }
- else
- {
- lems.emplace_back(nm->mkNode(Kind::OR, mis), InferenceId::NL_CAD_CONFLICT);
- }
- Trace("nl-cad") << "UNSAT with MIS: " << lems.back().d_node << std::endl;
+ Trace("nl-cad") << "UNSAT with MIS: " << mis << std::endl;
+ d_im.addConflict(NodeManager::currentNM()->mkAnd(mis),
+ InferenceId::NL_CAD_CONFLICT);
}
- return lems;
#else
Warning() << "Tried to use CadSolver but libpoly is not available. Compile "
"with --poly."
#endif
}
-std::vector<NlLemma> CadSolver::checkPartial()
+void CadSolver::checkPartial()
{
#ifdef CVC4_POLY_IMP
- std::vector<NlLemma> lems;
auto covering = d_CAC.getUnsatCover(0, true);
if (covering.empty())
{
}
Node conclusion =
excluding_interval_to_lemma(first_var, interval.d_interval, false);
- if (!conclusion.isNull()) {
+ if (!conclusion.isNull())
+ {
Node lemma = nm->mkNode(Kind::IMPLIES, premise, conclusion);
- Trace("nl-cad") << "Excluding " << first_var << " -> " << interval.d_interval << " using " << lemma << std::endl;
- lems.emplace_back(lemma, InferenceId::NL_CAD_EXCLUDED_INTERVAL);
- }
+ Trace("nl-cad") << "Excluding " << first_var << " -> "
+ << interval.d_interval << " using " << lemma
+ << std::endl;
+ d_im.addPendingArithLemma(lemma, InferenceId::NL_CAD_EXCLUDED_INTERVAL);
+ }
}
}
- return lems;
#else
Warning() << "Tried to use CadSolver but libpoly is not available. Compile "
"with --poly."
#include <vector>
#include "expr/node.h"
+#include "theory/arith/inference_manager.h"
#include "theory/arith/nl/cad/cdcac.h"
#include "theory/arith/nl/nl_model.h"
-#include "theory/arith/theory_arith.h"
namespace CVC4 {
namespace theory {
class CadSolver
{
public:
- CadSolver(TheoryArith& containing, NlModel& model);
+ CadSolver(InferenceManager& im, NlModel& model);
~CadSolver();
/**
* for construct_model_if_available. Otherwise, the single lemma can be used
* as an infeasible subset.
*/
- std::vector<NlLemma> checkFull();
+ void checkFull();
/**
* Perform a partial check, returning either {} or a list of lemmas.
* for construct_model_if_available. Otherwise, the lemmas exclude some part
* of the search space.
*/
- std::vector<NlLemma> checkPartial();
+ void checkPartial();
/**
* If a model is available (indicated by the last call to check_full() or
*/
bool d_foundSatisfiability;
- /** The theory of arithmetic containing this extension.*/
- TheoryArith& d_containing;
+ /** The inference manager we are pushing conflicts and lemmas to. */
+ InferenceManager& d_im;
/** Reference to the non-linear model object */
NlModel& d_model;
}; /* class CadSolver */
d_model(containing.getSatContext()),
d_trSlv(d_model),
d_nlSlv(containing, d_model),
- d_cadSlv(containing, d_model),
+ d_cadSlv(d_im, d_model),
d_iandSlv(containing, d_model),
d_builtModel(containing.getSatContext(), false)
{
}
if (options::nlCad())
{
- lemmas = d_cadSlv.checkFull();
- if (lemmas.empty())
+ d_cadSlv.checkFull();
+ if (!d_im.hasUsed())
{
Trace("nl-cad") << "nl-cad found SAT!" << std::endl;
}
- filterLemmas(lemmas, wlems);
+ else
+ {
+ // checkFull() only adds a single conflict
+ return 1;
+ }
}
// run the full refinement in the IAND solver
lemmas = d_iandSlv.checkFullRefine();
{
checkCardinalityExtended();
checkRegister();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
return;
}
checkMinCard();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
return;
}
checkCardCycles();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
return;
}
std::vector<Node> curr;
std::vector<Node> exp;
checkCardCyclesRec(s, curr, exp);
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
return;
}
}
d_im.assertInference(conc, n.eqNode(emp_set), "cg_emp");
d_im.doPendingLemmas();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
return;
}
Assert(!d_state.areEqual(n, emp_set));
d_im.assertInference(n.eqNode(emp_set), p.eqNode(emp_set), "cg_emppar");
d_im.doPendingLemmas();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
return;
}
<< "...derived " << conc.size() << " conclusions" << std::endl;
d_im.assertInference(conc, n.eqNode(p), "cg_eqpar");
d_im.doPendingLemmas();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
return;
}
Trace("sets-nf") << "Split empty : " << n << std::endl;
d_im.split(n.eqNode(emp_set), 1);
}
- Assert(d_im.hasProcessed());
+ Assert(d_im.hasSent());
return;
}
else
}
d_im.assertInference(conc, cpk.eqNode(cpnl), "cg_pareq");
d_im.doPendingLemmas();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
return;
}
Trace("sets-cycle-debug")
<< "Traverse card parent " << eqc << " -> " << cpnc << std::endl;
checkCardCyclesRec(cpnc, curr, exp);
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
return;
}
for (int i = (int)(d_oSetEqc.size() - 1); i >= 0; i--)
{
checkNormalForm(d_oSetEqc[i], intro_sets);
- if (d_im.hasProcessed() || !intro_sets.empty())
+ if (d_im.hasSent() || !intro_sets.empty())
{
return;
}
d_state.debugPrintSet(r, "sets-nf");
Trace("sets-nf") << std::endl;
d_im.split(r.eqNode(emp_set), 1);
- Assert(d_im.hasProcessed());
+ Assert(d_im.hasSent());
return;
}
}
}
if (!success)
{
- Assert(d_im.hasProcessed());
+ Assert(d_im.hasSent());
return;
}
// Send to parents (a parent is a set that contains a term in this equivalence
Trace("sets") << "----- Full effort check ------" << std::endl;
do
{
- Assert(!d_im.hasPendingLemma() || d_im.hasProcessed());
+ Assert(!d_im.hasPendingLemma() || d_im.hasSent());
Trace("sets") << "...iterate full effort check..." << std::endl;
fullEffortReset();
// We may have sent lemmas while registering the terms in the loop above,
// e.g. the cardinality solver.
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
continue;
}
// check subtypes
checkSubtypes();
d_im.doPendingLemmas();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
continue;
}
// check downwards closure
checkDownwardsClosure();
d_im.doPendingLemmas();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
continue;
}
// check upwards closure
checkUpwardsClosure();
d_im.doPendingLemmas();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
continue;
}
// check disequalities
checkDisequalities();
d_im.doPendingLemmas();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
continue;
}
// check reduce comprehensions
checkReduceComprehensions();
d_im.doPendingLemmas();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
continue;
}
{
// call the check method of the cardinality solver
d_cardSolver->check();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
continue;
}
}
} while (!d_im.hasSentLemma() && !d_state.isInConflict()
&& d_im.hasSentFact());
- Assert(!d_im.hasPendingLemma() || d_im.hasProcessed());
+ Assert(!d_im.hasPendingLemma() || d_im.hasSent());
Trace("sets") << "----- End full effort check, conflict="
<< d_state.isInConflict() << ", lemma=" << d_im.hasSentLemma()
<< std::endl;
}
}
}
- if (!d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (!d_im.hasSent())
{
if (options::setsExt())
{
lem = Rewriter::rewrite(lem);
d_im.assertInference(lem, d_true, "diseq", 1);
d_im.doPendingLemmas();
- if (d_im.hasProcessed())
+ if (d_im.hasSent())
{
return;
}
d_numCurrentFacts = 0;
}
-bool TheoryInferenceManager::hasProcessed() const
+bool TheoryInferenceManager::hasSent() const
{
return d_theoryState.isInConflict() || d_numCurrentLemmas > 0
|| d_numCurrentFacts > 0;
* Returns true if we are in conflict, or if we have sent a lemma or fact
* since the last call to reset.
*/
- bool hasProcessed() const;
+ bool hasSent() const;
//--------------------------------------- propagations
/**
* T-propagate literal lit, possibly encountered by equality engine,