+2015-11-30 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/68534
+ * decl.c (gfc_match_formal_arglist): Cope with zero formal args
+ either in interface declaration or in procedure declaration in
+ submodule.
+
2015-11-25 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/68227
* resolve.c (gfc_resolve_blocks): Handle EXEC_OACC_DECLARE.
* st.c (gfc_free_statement): Handle EXEC_OACC_DECLARE.
* symbol.c (check_conflict): Add conflict checks.
- (gfc_add_oacc_declare_create, gfc_add_oacc_declare_copyin,
+ (gfc_add_oacc_declare_create, gfc_add_oacc_declare_copyin,
gfc_add_oacc_declare_deviceptr, gfc_add_oacc_declare_device_resident):
New functions.
(gfc_copy_attr): Handle new symbols.
2015-11-21 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
* simplify.c (gfc_simplify_cshift): Work around bootstrap issues
- due to inappropriate warning options.
+ due to inappropriate warning options.
2015-11-21 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
(gfc_simplify_spread): Remove a FIXME and add error condition.
* intrinsic.h: Prototype for gfc_simplify_cshift
* intrinsic.c (add_functions): Use gfc_simplify_cshift.
-
+
2015-11-20 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/68237
goto cleanup;
}
- if (formal)
+ if (progname->attr.module_procedure && progname->attr.host_assoc)
{
+ bool arg_count_mismatch = false;
+
+ if (!formal && head)
+ arg_count_mismatch = true;
+
+ /* Abbreviated module procedure declaration is not meant to have any
+ formal arguments! */
+ if (!sym->abr_modproc_decl && formal && !head)
+ arg_count_mismatch = true;
+
for (p = formal, q = head; p && q; p = p->next, q = q->next)
{
if ((p->next != NULL && q->next == NULL)
|| (p->next == NULL && q->next != NULL))
- gfc_error_now ("Mismatch in number of MODULE PROCEDURE "
- "formal arguments at %C");
+ arg_count_mismatch = true;
else if ((p->sym == NULL && q->sym == NULL)
|| strcmp (p->sym->name, q->sym->name) == 0)
continue;
"argument names (%s/%s) at %C",
p->sym->name, q->sym->name);
}
+
+ if (arg_count_mismatch)
+ gfc_error_now ("Mismatch in number of MODULE PROCEDURE "
+ "formal arguments at %C");
}
return MATCH_YES;
+2015-11-30 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/68534
+ * gfortran.dg/submodule_13.f08: New test.
+
2015-11-30 Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* gcc.target/s390/load-relative-check.c: Add scan patterns for
--- /dev/null
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+! Checks the fix for PR68534 in which checks for the number
+! failed if either the interface or the module procedure had
+! no dummies.
+!
+! Reported on clf at:
+! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/-ZgbM5qkFmc
+!
+module m
+ implicit none
+ interface
+ module subroutine foo()
+ end subroutine foo
+
+ module subroutine bar(i)
+ integer, intent(inout) :: i
+ end subroutine bar
+ end interface
+end module m
+
+submodule(m) sm
+contains
+ module subroutine foo(i) ! { dg-error "Mismatch in number of MODULE PROCEDURE formal" }
+ integer, intent(inout) :: i
+ i = 42
+ end subroutine foo
+
+ module subroutine bar ! { dg-error "Mismatch in number of MODULE PROCEDURE formal" }
+ print *, "bar"
+ end subroutine bar
+end submodule sm