Formatting changes from Craig.

From-SVN: r23713

diff --git a/gcc/f/bugs.texi b/gcc/f/bugs.texi
index af18d80cdbce29c2134f9f820f46a86b2d1a2249..b591cfce04b2478d0c9b7db6ce51b614865d511c 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/f/bugs.texi
+++ b/gcc/f/bugs.texi
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ Version 0.6 should solve most or all remaining problems
 @cindex COMPLEX support
 @cindex support, COMPLEX
 @item
-Maintainers of gcc report that the back end definitely has ``broken''
+Maintainers of @code{gcc} report that the back end definitely has ``broken''
 support for @code{COMPLEX} types.
 Based on their input, it seems many of
 the problems affect only the more-general facilities for gcc's
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ by versions of @code{g77} prior to 0.5.20.
 when using the @samp{-fPIC} option (such as compiling for ELF targets)
 on the Intel x86 architecture target.
 The symptom is that the assembler complains about invalid opcodes.
-This bug is in the gcc back end.
+This bug is in the @code{gcc} back end.
 
 Fixed in @code{egcs} version 1.0.2.