symbol types are, by definition, in the .data section, so it is
correct to use SECT_OFF_DATA (objfile) here, not data_sect_index.
If there is no .data section, there should be no N_DATA or N_DATA
| N_EXT symbols.
+2003-09-12 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
+
+ * dbxread.c (read_dbx_symtab): The N_DATA and N_DATA | N_EXT
+ symbol types are, by definition, in the .data section, so it is
+ correct to use SECT_OFF_DATA (objfile) here, not data_sect_index.
+ If there is no .data section, there should be no N_DATA or N_DATA
+ | N_EXT symbols.
+
2003-09-12 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
* amd64fbsd-tdep.c: Fix sigtramp recognition.
case N_DATA | N_EXT:
case N_NBDATA | N_EXT:
- nlist.n_value += ANOFFSET (objfile->section_offsets, data_sect_index);
+ nlist.n_value += ANOFFSET (objfile->section_offsets, SECT_OFF_DATA (objfile));
goto record_it;
case N_BSS:
continue;
case N_DATA:
- nlist.n_value += ANOFFSET (objfile->section_offsets, data_sect_index);
+ nlist.n_value += ANOFFSET (objfile->section_offsets, SECT_OFF_DATA (objfile));
goto record_it;
case N_UNDF | N_EXT: