tree-vect-patterns: Don't create over widening patterns for stmts used in reductions...
authorJakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:32:23 +0000 (10:32 +0100)
committerJakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:32:23 +0000 (10:32 +0100)
As discussed in the PR, the reduction code isn't able to cope with type
promotions/demotions in the reduction computation, so if we recognize an
over-widening pattern that has vect_reduction_def type, we most likely make
it non-vectorizable.

2021-02-02  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

PR tree-optimization/98848
* tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_recog_over_widening_pattern): Punt if
STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (last_stmt_info) is vect_reduction_def.

* gcc.dg/vect/pr98848.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/vect/pr92205.c: Remove xfail.

gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr92205.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr98848.c [new file with mode: 0644]
gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c

index a031c1fe297ca8af18630f0360c09bd20de0427c..ea06660de1effa54f9d4ce61a9072ac1569d1fab 100644 (file)
@@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ int b(int n, unsigned char *a)
   return d;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "vectorized 1 loops" "vect" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "vectorized 1 loops" "vect" { target { vect_unpack && { ! vect_no_bitwise } } } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr98848.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr98848.c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..5cf7c9f
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/98848 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
+
+short a[9000];
+
+int
+foo (void)
+{ 
+  int b = a[0];
+  int i;
+  for (i = 1; i < 9000; i ++)
+    if (a[i] < b)
+      b = a[i];
+  return b;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loop" 1 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_int_add || vect_no_int_min_max } } } } */
index 2197265309cf3d494c5424d41ba0f86ac4e3e4ee..b575b456301a565ba7eab904879d087f91743fd8 100644 (file)
@@ -1579,6 +1579,10 @@ vect_recog_over_widening_pattern (vec_info *vinfo,
   tree type = TREE_TYPE (lhs);
   tree_code code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (last_stmt);
 
+  /* Punt for reductions where we don't handle the type conversions.  */
+  if (STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (last_stmt_info) == vect_reduction_def)
+    return NULL;
+
   /* Keep the first operand of a COND_EXPR as-is: only the other two
      operands are interesting.  */
   unsigned int first_op = (code == COND_EXPR ? 2 : 1);