intel/fs: Don't allocate a param array for zero push constants
authorJason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@intel.com>
Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:02:34 +0000 (08:02 -0700)
committerJason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@intel.com>
Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:55:21 +0000 (09:55 -0700)
Thanks to the ralloc invariant of "any pointer returned from ralloc can
be used as a context", calling ralloc_size with a size of zero will
cause it to allocate at least a header.  If we don't have any push
constants, then NULL is perfectly acceptable (and even preferred).

Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli@intel.com>
src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp

index e2176827a64fa3e73c709342b0de934adebe2196..afad6805d290869879d0a8bb0a0c7202b9825535 100644 (file)
@@ -2092,7 +2092,14 @@ fs_visitor::assign_constant_locations()
     */
    uint32_t *param = stage_prog_data->param;
    stage_prog_data->nr_params = num_push_constants;
-   stage_prog_data->param = ralloc_array(mem_ctx, uint32_t, num_push_constants);
+   if (num_push_constants) {
+      stage_prog_data->param = ralloc_array(mem_ctx, uint32_t,
+                                            num_push_constants);
+   } else {
+      stage_prog_data->param = NULL;
+   }
+   assert(stage_prog_data->nr_pull_params == 0);
+   assert(stage_prog_data->pull_param == NULL);
    if (num_pull_constants > 0) {
       stage_prog_data->nr_pull_params = num_pull_constants;
       stage_prog_data->pull_param = ralloc_array(mem_ctx, uint32_t,