Commit
049a8570 (Use target_continue{,_no_signal} instead of target_resume)
replaces the code stopping lwp with target_continue_no_signal in
target_stop_and_wait, like this,
- resume_info.thread = ptid;
- resume_info.kind = resume_stop;
- resume_info.sig = GDB_SIGNAL_0;
- (*the_target->resume) (&resume_info, 1);
+ target_continue_no_signal (ptid);
the replacement is not equivalent, and it causes PR 20627. This patch
is just to revert that change.
Regression testing it on x86_64-linux.
gdb/gdbserver:
2016-09-30 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
PR gdbserver/20627
* target.c (target_stop_and_wait): Don't call
target_continue_no_signal, use resume_stop instead.
+2016-09-30 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
+
+ PR gdbserver/20627
+ * target.c (target_stop_and_wait): Don't call
+ target_continue_no_signal, use resume_stop instead.
+
2016-09-26 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* linux-low.c (linux_wait_1): Call debug_exit.
{
struct target_waitstatus status;
int was_non_stop = non_stop;
+ struct thread_resume resume_info;
- target_continue_no_signal (ptid);
+ resume_info.thread = ptid;
+ resume_info.kind = resume_stop;
+ resume_info.sig = GDB_SIGNAL_0;
+ (*the_target->resume) (&resume_info, 1);
non_stop = 1;
mywait (ptid, &status, 0, 0);