+2016-11-16 Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
+
+ * gdb.python/py-recurse-unwind.c (main): Add loop.
+ * gdb.python/py-recurse-unwind.py (TestUnwinder): Add calls
+ to read_register() and gdb.parse_and_eval(). Make each code
+ call a separate case that can be individually tested.
+ * gdb.python/py-recurse-unwind.exp (cont_and_backtrace): New
+ proc. Call cont_and_backtrace for each of the code paths that
+ we want to test in the unwinder.
+
2016-11-15 Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* gdb.dwarf2/bitfield-parent-optimized-out.exp: Fix DWARF code for
return 0
}
-gdb_breakpoint "ccc"
-gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "ccc"
-
-# If the unwinder is active, the usage count will increment while
-# running to the breakpoint. Reset it prior to doing the backtrace.
-gdb_test_no_output "python TestUnwinder.reset_count()"
-
-# The python based unwinder should be called a number of times while
-# generating the backtrace, but its sniffer always returns None. So
-# it doesn't really contribute to generating any of the frames below.
-#
-# But that's okay. Our goal here is to make sure that GDB doesn't
-# get hung up in potentially infinite recursion when invoking the
-# Python-based unwinder.
-
-gdb_test_sequence "bt" "backtrace" {
- "\\r\\n#0 .* ccc \\(arg=789\\) at "
- "\\r\\n#1 .* bbb \\(arg=456\\) at "
- "\\r\\n#2 .* aaa \\(arg=123\\) at "
- "\\r\\n#3 .* main \\(.*\\) at"
+proc cont_and_backtrace { tst } {
+
+ with_test_prefix $tst {
+ gdb_breakpoint "ccc"
+
+ # We're testing different code paths within the unwinder's sniffer.
+ # Set the current path to be tested here.
+ gdb_test_no_output "python TestUnwinder.set_test(\"$tst\")" \
+ "set code path within python unwinder to $tst"
+
+ # If the unwinder is active, the usage count will increment while
+ # running to the breakpoint. Reset it prior to doing the backtrace.
+ gdb_test_no_output "python TestUnwinder.reset_count()" \
+ "reset count"
+
+ gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "ccc"
+
+ # The python based unwinder should be called a number of times while
+ # generating the backtrace, but its sniffer always returns None. So
+ # it doesn't really contribute to generating any of the frames below.
+ #
+ # But that's okay. Our goal here is to make sure that GDB doesn't
+ # get hung up in potentially infinite recursion when invoking the
+ # Python-based unwinder.
+
+ gdb_test_sequence "bt" "backtrace" {
+ "\\r\\n#0 .* ccc \\(arg=789\\) at "
+ "\\r\\n#1 .* bbb \\(arg=456\\) at "
+ "\\r\\n#2 .* aaa \\(arg=123\\) at "
+ "\\r\\n#3 .* main \\(.*\\) at"
+ }
+
+ # Test that the python-based unwinder / sniffer was actually called
+ # during generation of the backtrace.
+ gdb_test "python print(TestUnwinder.count > 0)" "True" \
+ "python unwinder called"
+ }
}
-# Test that the python-based unwinder / sniffer was actually called
-# during generation of the backtrace.
-gdb_test "python print(TestUnwinder.count > 0)" "True"
+cont_and_backtrace "check_undefined_symbol"
+cont_and_backtrace "check_user_reg_pc"
+cont_and_backtrace "check_pae_pc"
def inc_count (cls):
cls.count += 1
+ test = 'check_undefined_symbol'
+
+ @classmethod
+ def set_test (cls, test) :
+ cls.test = test
+
def __init__(self):
Unwinder.__init__(self, "test unwinder")
self.recurse_level = 0
def __call__(self, pending_frame):
-
if self.recurse_level > 0:
gdb.write("TestUnwinder: Recursion detected - returning early.\n")
return None
self.recurse_level += 1
TestUnwinder.inc_count()
- try:
- val = gdb.parse_and_eval("undefined_symbol")
+ if TestUnwinder.test == 'check_user_reg_pc' :
+
+ pc = pending_frame.read_register('pc')
+ pc_as_int = int(pc.cast(gdb.lookup_type('int')))
+ # gdb.write("In unwinder: pc=%x\n" % pc_as_int)
+
+ elif TestUnwinder.test == 'check_pae_pc' :
+
+ pc = gdb.parse_and_eval('$pc')
+ pc_as_int = int(pc.cast(gdb.lookup_type('int')))
+ # gdb.write("In unwinder: pc=%x\n" % pc_as_int)
+
+ elif TestUnwinder.test == 'check_undefined_symbol' :
+
+ try:
+ val = gdb.parse_and_eval("undefined_symbol")
- except Exception as arg:
- pass
+ except Exception as arg:
+ pass
self.recurse_level -= 1