+2010-03-12 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/9708:
+ * dwarf2read.c (die_needs_namespace) <DW_TAG_variable>: A variable
+ in a lexical block does not need a namespace.
+ (new_symbol) <DW_TAG_variable>: Put extern variables on
+ list_in_scope in all cases.
+
2010-03-12 Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
* ax-gdb.c (gen_expr): Add shift expressions.
static int
die_needs_namespace (struct die_info *die, struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
{
+ struct attribute *attr;
+
switch (die->tag)
{
case DW_TAG_namespace:
spec_cu);
}
- if (dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_external, cu)
- || die->parent->tag == DW_TAG_namespace)
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
+ attr = dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_external, cu);
+ if (attr == NULL && die->parent->tag != DW_TAG_namespace)
+ return 0;
+ /* A variable in a lexical block of some kind does not need a
+ namespace, even though in C++ such variables may be external
+ and have a mangled name. */
+ if (die->parent->tag == DW_TAG_lexical_block
+ || die->parent->tag == DW_TAG_try_block
+ || die->parent->tag == DW_TAG_catch_block)
+ return 0;
+ return 1;
default:
return 0;
var_decode_location (attr, sym, cu);
attr2 = dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_external, cu);
if (attr2 && (DW_UNSND (attr2) != 0))
- add_symbol_to_list (sym, &global_symbols);
+ {
+ struct pending **list_to_add;
+
+ /* A variable with DW_AT_external is never static,
+ but it may be block-scoped. */
+ list_to_add = (cu->list_in_scope == &file_symbols
+ ? &global_symbols : cu->list_in_scope);
+ add_symbol_to_list (sym, list_to_add);
+ }
else
add_symbol_to_list (sym, cu->list_in_scope);
}
+2010-03-12 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/9708:
+ * gdb.cp/m-static.exp: Add regression test.
+ * gdb.cp/m-static.cc (method): New method.
+ (main): Call it.
+
2010-03-12 Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>
* gdb.cp/gdb2384-base.h: Created 'namespace B'.
public:
gnu_obj_1(antiquities a, long l) {}
+
+ long method ()
+ {
+ static bool svar = true;
+ return key2;
+ }
};
const bool gnu_obj_1::test;
test4.dummy = test4.elsewhere;
test4.dummy = 0;
- return test4.dummy; // breakpoint: constructs-done
+
+ test1.method (); // breakpoint: constructs-done
+
+ return test4.dummy;
}
# that GDB's current behavior in such situations is either consistent
# across platforms or optimal, so I'm not including one now.
+# Step into test1.method and examine the method-scoped static.
+# This is a regression test for PR 9708.
+gdb_test "step" "gnu_obj_1::method.*"
+gdb_test "print svar" " = true"
+
gdb_exit
return 0