We are hitting a recursive loop when printing the signature of a function
containing a decltype([]{}) type. The loop is
dump_function_decl -> dump_substitution
-> dump_template_bindings
-> dump_type
-> dump_aggr_type
-> dump_scope -> dump_function_decl
and we loop because dump_template_bindings wants to print the resolved type of
decltype([]{}) (i.e. just a lambda type), so it calls dump_aggr_type, which
wants to print the function scope of the lambda type. But the function scope of
the lambda type is the function which we're in the middle of printing.
This patch breaks the loop by passing TFF_NO_FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS to
dump_function_decl from dump_scope, so that we avoid recursing into
dump_substitution and ultimately looping.
This also means we no longer emit the "[with ...]" clause when printing a
function template scope, and we instead just emit its template argument list in
a more natural way, e.g. instead of
foo(int, char) [with T=bool]::x
we would now print
foo<bool>::x
which seems like an improvement on its own.
The full signature of the function 'spam' in the below testcase is now
void spam(decltype (<lambda>)*) [with T = int; decltype (<lambda>) = spam<int>::<lambda()>]
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94521
* error.c (dump_scope): Pass TFF_NO_FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS to
dump_function_decl when printing a function template instantiation as a
scope.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94521
* g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval12.C: New test.
2020-04-13 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
+ PR c++/94521
+ * error.c (dump_scope): Pass TFF_NO_FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS to
+ dump_function_decl when printing a function template instantiation as a
+ scope.
+
PR c++/94470
* constexpr.c (get_or_insert_ctor_field): Set default value of parameter
'pos_hint' to -1.
}
else if ((flags & TFF_SCOPE) && TREE_CODE (scope) == FUNCTION_DECL)
{
+ if (DECL_USE_TEMPLATE (scope))
+ f |= TFF_NO_FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS;
dump_function_decl (pp, scope, f);
pp_cxx_colon_colon (pp);
}
2020-04-13 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
+ PR c++/94521
+ * g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval12.C: New test.
+
PR c++/94470
* g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-nsdmi8.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-nsdmi9.C: New test.
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/94521
+// { dg-do compile { target c++2a } }
+
+template <typename T>
+void spam(decltype([]{}) *s)
+{
+ static_assert(__is_same(int, decltype(s))); // { dg-error "static assertion failed" }
+}
+
+void foo()
+{
+ spam<int>(nullptr);
+}