Found by inspection.
I'm not aware of any actual failures caused by this, but a precise
sequence of ralloc_adopt and ralloc_free should be able to cause
problems.
v2: make the code slightly clearer (Eric)
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
for (child = old_info->child; child->next != NULL; child = child->next) {
child->parent = new_info;
}
+ child->parent = new_info;
/* Connect the two lists together; parent them to new_ctx; make old_ctx empty. */
child->next = new_info->child;
- child->parent = new_info;
+ if (child->next)
+ child->next->prev = child;
new_info->child = old_info->child;
old_info->child = NULL;
}